Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35196107›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2022

Minority Enrollment in Phase II and III Clinical Trials in Urologic Oncology.

Jeunice Owens-Walton, Cheyenne Williams, Alexis Rompré-Brodeur, Peter A Pinto, Mark W Ball

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Prostate cancer screening in Black men in Canada: a case for risk-stratified care.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeunice Owens-WaltonUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Cheyenne WilliamsUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-3167-6989
Alexis Rompré-BrodeurUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0001-8177-0514
Peter A PintoUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Mark W BallUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-1780-2627

Funding

Prostate SectionZIABC011081 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI PINTO, PETER · 2009 to 2025
$15.2M
NCI NIH HHS Y99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProportionate minority representation in clinical trials is an important step toward addressing health care inequities. Given the paucity of data on this topic in urologic oncology, we sought to quantify the enrollment of minority patients in clinical trials studying prostate, kidney, and bladder/urothelial cancers.

methodsThe ClincialTrials.gov database was queried for completed phase II and III interventional trials in prostate, kidney, and bladder cancers. The SEER database was used to calculate the US prevalence of these genitourinary cancers. Representation quotients (RQ) were calculated to describe the relative proportion of each racial/ethnic group enrolled in clinical trials over the proportion of persons from each group among national cancer cases by cancer type.

resultsOf 341 trials that met initial eligibility criteria, only 169 (49.7%) reported data on race or ethnicity. Aggregate RQs from 2000 to 2017 showed that White patients were continually over-represented in trials for all cancer types. Black and Asian patients were poorly represented across all cancer types. When stratified by 3-year increments, the RQs remained stable for all races, from 2000 to 2017. When stratified by ethnicity, Hispanic patients were under-represented across all cancer types in the study period. When examining representation by funding source, we found that US government-funded clinical trials proportionally enroll the most diverse patient populations over those funded by academic institutions and industry. Interestingly, more than 50% of the trials examined did not report race nor ethnicity, highlighting a crucial flaw in investigator compliance with federal clinical trial mandates.

conclusionClinical trials targeting prostate, kidney, and bladder cancers continue to under-represent racial/ethnic minority patients. On the basis of the incidence of these cancers within minority populations, efforts should focus on creating racially and ethnically inclusive cancer research.

Indexed as

Minority GroupsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMedical OncologyRacial GroupsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID35196107
PMCPMC9084430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.