Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35195901›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2022

Anatomically and physiologically informed computational model of hepatic contrast perfusion for virtual imaging trials.

Thomas J Sauer, Ehsan Abadi, Paul Segars, Ehsan Samei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development and Application of a Virtual Imaging Trial framework for Airway Quantifications via CT.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas J SauerCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials (CVIT), Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Road, #302, Durham, North Carolina, 27705, USA.
Ehsan AbadiCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials (CVIT), Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Road, #302, Durham, North Carolina, 27705, USA.
Paul SegarsCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials (CVIT), Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Road, #302, Durham, North Carolina, 27705, USA.
Ehsan SameiCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials (CVIT), Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Road, #302, Durham, North Carolina, 27705, USA.

Funding

TR&D Project 3: Virtual ReadersP41EB028744 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Ehsan Samei · 2021 to 2026
$7.8M
Simulation Tools for Dynamic CTR01EB001838 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SAMEI, EHSAN, SEGARS, WILLIAM P · 2005 to 2023
$6.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028744NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001838NIH HHS P41EB028744NIH HHS R01EB001838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVirtual (in silico) imaging trials (VITs), involving computerized phantoms and models of the imaging process, provide a modern alternative to clinical imaging trials. VITs are faster, safer, and enable otherwise-impossible investigations. Current phantoms used in VITs are limited in their ability to model functional behavior such as contrast perfusion which is an important determinant of dose and image quality in CT imaging. In our prior work with the XCAT computational phantoms, we determined and modeled inter-organ (organ to organ) intravenous contrast concentration as a function of time from injection. However, intra-organ concentration, heterogeneous distribution within a given organ, was not pursued. We extend our methods in this work to model intra-organ concentration within the XCAT phantom with a specific focus on the liver.

methodsIntra-organ contrast perfusion depends on the organ's vessel network. We modeled the intricate vascular structures of the liver, informed by empirical and theoretical observations of anatomy and physiology. The developed vessel generation algorithm modeled a dual-input-single-output vascular network as a series of bifurcating surfaces to optimally deliver flow within the bounding surface of a given XCAT liver. Using this network, contrast perfusion was simulated within voxelized versions of the phantom by using knowledge of the blood velocities in each vascular structure, vessel diameters and length, and the time since the contrast entered the hepatic artery. The utility of the enhanced phantom was demonstrated through a simulation study with the phantom voxelized prior to CT simulation with the relevant liver vasculature prepared to represent blood and iodinated contrast media. The spatial extent of the blood-contrast mixture was compared to clinical data.

resultsThe vascular structures of the liver were generated with size and orientation which resulted in minimal energy expenditure required to maintain blood flow. Intravenous contrast was simulated as having known concentration and known total volume in the liver as calibrated from time-concentration curves. Measurements of simulated CT ROIs were found to agree with clinically observed values of early arterial phase contrast enhancement of the parenchyma (

conclusionsThe computational methods presented here furthered the development of the XCAT phantoms allowing for multi-timepoint contrast perfusion simulations, enabling more anthropomorphic virtual clinical trials intended for optimization of current clinical imaging technologies and applications.

Indexed as

LiverTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputer SimulationPerfusionPhantoms, Imagingliver modelingtissue modelingvirtual phantomXCAT

Identifiers

PMID35195901
PMCPMC9547339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.