Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35195858›Full record

SynthesisMolecular diagnosis & therapy2022

Mutational Characteristics of Primary Mucosal Melanoma: A Systematic Review.

Olivia Beaudoux, Jean-Baptiste Oudart, Laurence Riffaud, Laetitia Visseaux, Aude Marchal, Anne-Sophie Lebre, Florent Grange

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. ATRX Loss in the Development and Prognosis of Conjunctival Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olivia BeaudouxCHU Reims, Service de Pathologie, Reims, France. obeaudoux@chu-reims.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-2848-5869
Jean-Baptiste OudartUniversité de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, SFR CAP-Santé (FED 4231), Laboratoire de Biochimie Médicale et Biologie Moléculaire, Reims, France.
Laurence RiffaudCHU Reims, Service d'Oncodermatologie, Reims, France.
Laetitia VisseauxCHU Reims, Service d'Oncodermatologie, Reims, France.
Aude MarchalCHU Reims, Service de Pathologie, Reims, France.
Anne-Sophie LebreCHU Reims, Pôle de Biologie, Service de Génétique, Reims, France.
Florent GrangeUniversité de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, EA 7509: Immune Dysregulation and Tissue Remodelling in Cancer, Autoimmune and Inflammatory Diseases, Reims, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary mucosal melanomas (PMMs) are rare and clinically heterogeneous, including head and neck (HNMs), vulvovaginal (VVMs), conjunctival (CjMs), anorectal (ARMs) and penile (PMs) melanomas. While the prognosis of advanced cutaneous melanoma has noticeably improved using treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and molecules targeting BRAF and MEK, few advances have been made for PMMs because of their poorer response to ICIs and their different genetic profile. This prompted us to conduct a systematic review of molecular studies of PMMs to clarify their pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets.

methodsAll articles that examined gene mutations in PMMs were identified from the databases and selected based on predefined inclusion criteria. Mutation rate was calculated for all PMMs and each location group by relating the number of mutations identified to the total number of samples analysed.

resultsAmong 1,581 studies identified, 88 were selected. Overall, the frequency of KIT, BRAF and NRAS mutation was 13.5%, 12.9% and 12.1%, respectively. KIT mutation ranged from 6.4% for CjMs to 16.6% for ARMs, BRAF mutation from 8.6% for ARMs to 31.1% for CjMs, and NRAS mutation from 6.2% for ARMs to 18.5% for CjMs. Among 101 other genes analysed, 33 had mutation rates over 10%, including TTN, TSC1, POM121, NF1, MTOR and SF3B1.

conclusionIn addition to BRAF, NRAS and KIT genes commonly studied, our systematic review identified significantly mutated genes that have already been associated (e.g., TSC1, mTOR, POLE or ATRX) or could be associated with (future) targeted therapies. PROSPERO ID: CRD42020185552.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsHumansMembrane GlycoproteinsMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesMembrane GlycoproteinsPOM121 protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID35195858
OpenAlexW4213054758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.