Trial reportHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2022
Is absorbable mesh useful in preventing parastomal hernia after emergency surgery? The PARTHENOPE study.
Trial report in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04436887 (Prophylactic Sub-lay Non-absorbable Mesh Following Emergent Midline Laparotomy Clean/Contaminated Field), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prophylactic Sub-lay Non-absorbable Mesh Following Emergent Midline Laparotomy Clean/Contaminated Field: Early Results of a Randomized Double-blind Prospective Trial: PROMETHEUS
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing the effectiveness of prophylactic strategies for parastomal hernia prevention: a network meta-analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Pooled it
- Prophylactic mesh reinforcement in elective abdominal surgeries: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE evidence assessment.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Use of prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia formation: a systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Postoperative outcomes and wound events in incisional hernia repair using hybrid mesh: results from a prospective multicenter italian study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
- Analysis of surgical quality indicators after certification as a Hernia Center.Updates in surgery · 2024Article
- Prophylactic Mesh Augmentation of Midline Closure in Patients Undergoing Resection for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Reduces the Rate of Incisional Hernia: Results of a Case-Series Study.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2024Article
- Absorbable mesh in a contaminated field: hernia repair outcomes.Updates in surgery · 2023Article
- Posterior component separation with TAR: lessons learned from our first consecutive 52 cases.Updates in surgery · 2023Article
- Update Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and GRADE Assessment of the Evidence on Parastomal Hernia Prevention-A EHS, ESCP and EAES Collaborative Project.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2023Article
- EHS Rapid Guideline: Evidence-Informed European Recommendations on Parastomal Hernia Prevention-With ESCP and EAES Participation.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeColostomy is a frequent event in oncological or inflammatory bowel diseases. Its related morbidity includes retraction, infection and parastomal hernia (PH), which is a quite common late complication. Several surgical options are available for PH repair, the majority including mesh. However, results are often disappointing with relevant recurrence rates, up to 33%. The study aim was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of prophylactic biosynthetic mesh (BIO-A
methodsPatients were clinically followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months and received a CT scan at 6 and 12 months. The postoperative morbidity and wound events were also evaluated.
results55 patients receiving conventional colostomy considered as Control Group and 55 patients receiving BIO-A mesh supported colostomy (Mesh Group) were included in the study. At 12 months, the incidence of PH was 9 (12.7%) and 24 (43.6%) in the Mesh Group and Control Group, respectively (p < 0.05). Postoperative morbidity was similar between Mesh Group and Control Group (7 [12.7%] vs 4 [7.3%], respectively; p = 0.340). The multivariable analysis showed that not using a mesh (p = 0.042), age > 70 years (p = 0.041), diabetes (p < 0.001), colon dilation > 7 cm (p < 0.0001) and COPD (p = 0.009) were all related with postoperative PH.
conclusionsThe prophylactic BIO-A mesh positioning during colostomy is an effective procedure reducing PH incidence at a 1 years follow-up guaranteeing low postoperative morbidity. STUDY DATASET IS AVAILABLE ON CLINICALTRIALS. GOV ID: NCT04436887.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.