Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35195753›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2022

Esophageal Achalasia: Diagnostic Evaluation.

Federica Riccio, Mario Costantini, Renato Salvador

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Re-operation after prior esophagomyotomy.Journal of visualized surgery · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Federica RiccioDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, School of Medicine, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Mario CostantiniDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, School of Medicine, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Renato SalvadorDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, School of Medicine, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, University of Padova, Padua, Italy. renato.salvador@unipd.it.ORCID 0000-0002-3281-0361

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A precise diagnosis is key to the successful treatment of achalasia. Barium swallow, upper endoscopy and high-resolution manometry provide the necessary information about a patient's anatomy, absence of other diseases, and type of achalasia (I, II, III). High-resolution manometry also has prognostic value, the best results of treatment being obtained in type II achalasia according to the Chicago classification. Abdominal CT scanning and endoscopic ultrasound might be warranted if an underlying malignancy is suspected.

Indexed as

Esophageal AchalasiaHumansManometryTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID35195753
PMCPMC9174137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.