Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35195743›Full record

ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2022

[Targeted muscle reinnervation and targeted sensory reinnervation : Role of complex neurotization after amputation].

Richarda Böttcher

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richarda BöttcherSchwerpunkt für rekonstruktive Chirurgie bei Plexusparese, Tetraplegie und Cerebralparese, Hand‑, Replantations- und Mikrochirurgie, BG Klinikum Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin gGmbH, Warener Str. 7, 12683, Berlin, Deutschland. richarda.boettcher@ukb.de.
Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In association with major amputations of the upper and lower extremities, surgical procedures with nerve transfer are increasingly being introduced. In order to examine the value of these procedures the currently available data were analyzed and related to the corresponding insights from conventional amputation surgery as well as confirmed aspects of microsurgery of peripheral nerves. Mainly retrospective observations of low case numbers and sometimes individually different surgical approaches can be found. Risk analysis and sufficient long-term follow-up periods are lacking as well as comparisons with appropriate control groups. The published results on operative procedures with selected nerve transfers after or during amputation do not currently allow any conclusions about the advantages. Systematic influences in the assessment of the results are probable. Implementation of these treatment options outside controlled clinical trials cannot be recommended.

Indexed as

Nerve TransferNeuromaPhantom LimbAmputation StumpsAmputation, SurgicalHumansMuscle, SkeletalRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAmputation surgeryMicrosurgeryNerve transferNeuromaPhantom limb pain

Identifiers

PMID35195743
OpenAlexW4213104242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.