Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35195670›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2022

Visual discrimination of optical material properties: A large-scale study.

Masataka Sawayama, Yoshinori Dobashi, Makoto Okabe, Kenchi Hosokawa, Takuya Koumura, Toni P Saarela, Maria Olkkonen, Shin'ya Nishida

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Predicting visual field boundaries from head features.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2025
    Article
  6. Core dimensions of human material perception.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Translucency perception: A review.Journal of vision · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Masataka SawayamaInria, Bordeaux, France.
Yoshinori DobashiInformation Media Environment Laboratory, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan.
Makoto OkabeDepartment of Mathematical and Systems Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, Japan.
Kenchi HosokawaAdvanced Comprehensive Research Organization, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takuya KoumuraNTT Communication Science Laboratories, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation, Kanagawa, Japan.
Toni P SaarelaDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Maria OlkkonenDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Shin'ya NishidaCognitive Informatics Lab, Graduate School of informatics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
NTT (Japan) · JPUniversity of Helsinki · FIAssociation for Computing Machinery · USKyoto College of Graduate Studies for Informatics · JPSK Group (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex visual processing involved in perceiving the object materials can be better elucidated by taking a variety of research approaches. Sharing stimulus and response data is an effective strategy to make the results of different studies directly comparable and can assist researchers with different backgrounds to jump into the field. Here, we constructed a database containing several sets of material images annotated with visual discrimination performance. We created the material images using physically based computer graphics techniques and conducted psychophysical experiments with them in both laboratory and crowdsourcing settings. The observer's task was to discriminate materials on one of six dimensions (gloss contrast, gloss distinctness of image, translucent vs. opaque, metal vs. plastic, metal vs. glass, and glossy vs. painted). The illumination consistency and object geometry were also varied. We used a nonverbal procedure (an oddity task) applicable for diverse use cases, such as cross-cultural, cross-species, clinical, or developmental studies. Results showed that the material discrimination depended on the illuminations and geometries and that the ability to discriminate the spatial consistency of specular highlights in glossiness perception showed larger individual differences than in other tasks. In addition, analysis of visual features showed that the parameters of higher order color texture statistics can partially, but not completely, explain task performance. The results obtained through crowdsourcing were highly correlated with those obtained in the laboratory, suggesting that our database can be used even when the experimental conditions are not strictly controlled in the laboratory. Several projects using our dataset are underway.

Indexed as

Form PerceptionContrast SensitivityHumansPhotic StimulationSurface PropertiesVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID35195670
PMCPMC8883156
OpenAlexW4220805147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.