Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35195447›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2022

Current Breast Milk PFAS Levels in the United States and Canada: After All This Time, Why Don't We Know More?

Judy S LaKind, Marc-André Verner, Rachel D Rogers, Helen Goeden, Daniel Q Naiman, Satori A Marchitti, Geniece M Lehmann, Erin P Hines, Suzanne E Fenton

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06107933 (Developmental Impacts of MicroPLastics Exposure in Early Life), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06107933 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Developmental Impacts of MicroPLastics Exposure in Early Life

TypeobservationalSponsorJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthRan2023 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsInfant Development, Breast Feeding, Environmental ExposureArmsObservational only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Public health evaluation of PFAS exposures and breastfeeding: a systematic literature review.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Determinants of maternal and neonatal PFAS concentrations: a review.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Judy S LaKindLaKind Associates, LLC, Catonsville, Maryland, USA.
Marc-André VernerDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1935-8913
Rachel D RogersOffice of the Director, National Center for Environmental Health/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9716-1075
Helen GoedenEnvironmental Health Division, Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Daniel Q NaimanDepartment of Applied Mathematics & Statistics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6504-9081
Satori A MarchittiLaKind Associates, LLC, Catonsville, Maryland, USA.
Geniece M LehmannCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7172-4175
Erin P HinesCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Suzanne E FentonDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8956-398X
Environmental Protection Agency · USAgency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry · USCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal · CAJohns Hopkins University · USMinnesota Department of Health · USNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite 20 y of biomonitoring studies of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in both serum and urine, we have an extremely limited understanding of PFAS concentrations in breast milk of women from the United States and Canada. The lack of robust information on PFAS concentrations in breast milk and implications for breastfed infants and their families were brought to the forefront by communities impacted by PFAS contamination.

objectivesThe objectives of this work are to:

methodsWe used three studies reporting breast milk concentrations in the United States and Canada We also estimated breast milk PFAS concentrations by multiplying publicly available serum concentrations by milk:serum partitioning ratios for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS), and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA). Measured and estimated breast milk concentrations were compared to children's drinking water screening values. DISCUSSION: Geometric means of estimated breast milk concentrations ranged over approximately two orders of magnitude for the different surveys/communities. All geometric mean and mean estimated and measured breast milk PFOA and PFOS concentrations exceeded drinking water screening values for children, sometimes by more than two orders of magnitude. For PFHxS and PFNA, all measured breast milk levels were below the drinking water screening values for children; the geometric mean estimated breast milk concentrations were close to-or exceeded-the children's drinking water screening values for certain communities. Exceeding a children's drinking water screening value does not indicate that adverse health effects will occur and should not be interpreted as a reason to not breastfeed; it indicates that the situation should be further evaluated. It is past time to have a better understanding of environmental chemical transfer to-and concentrations in-an exceptional source of infant nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10359.

Indexed as

Alkanesulfonic AcidsDrinking WaterEnvironmental PollutantsFluorocarbonsBreast FeedingCanadaCaprylatesChildFemaleHumansInfantMilk, HumanUnited StatesAlkanesulfonic AcidsCaprylatesDrinking WaterEnvironmental PollutantsFluorocarbons

Identifiers

PMID35195447
PMCPMC8865090
OpenAlexW4213419499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.