Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35195442›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2022

Reoccurring Bovine Anthrax in Germany on the Same Pasture after 12 Years.

Peter Braun, Wolfgang Beyer, Matthias Hanczaruk, Julia M Riehm, Markus Antwerpen, Christian Otterbein, Jacqueline Oesterheld, Gregor Grass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Persistence in time: the hunt forApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Archival and Newly Isolated HistoricalPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Identification ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peter BraunDepartment of Bacteriology and Toxinology, Bundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Munich, Germany.
Wolfgang BeyerDepartment of Livestock Infectiology and Environmental Hygiene, Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Matthias HanczarukBavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Julia M RiehmBavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Markus AntwerpenDepartment of Bacteriology and Toxinology, Bundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Munich, Germany.
Christian OtterbeinLocal Veterinarian Unit, Rosenheim, Germany.
Jacqueline OesterheldDepartment of Bacteriology and Toxinology, Bundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Munich, Germany.
Gregor GrassDepartment of Bacteriology and Toxinology, Bundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8002-7718

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The zoonotic disease anthrax, caused by the endospore-forming bacterium Bacillus anthracis, is very rare in Germany. In the state of Bavaria, the last case occurred in July of 2009, resulting in four dead cows. In August of 2021, the disease reemerged after heavy rains, killing one gestating cow. Notably, both outbreaks affected the same pasture, suggesting a close epidemiological connection. B. anthracis could be grown from blood culture, and the presence of both virulence plasmids (pXO1 and pXO2) was confirmed by PCR. Also, recently developed diagnostic tools enabled rapid detection of B. anthracis cells and nucleic acids directly in clinical samples. The complete genome of the strain isolated from blood, designated BF-5, was DNA sequenced and phylogenetically grouped within the B.Br.CNEVA clade, which is typical for European B. anthracis strains. The genome was almost identical to BF-1, the isolate from 2009, separated only by three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the chromosome, one on plasmid pXO2 and three indel regions. Further, B. anthracis DNA was detected by PCR from soil samples taken from spots in the pasture where the cow had fallen. New tools based on phage receptor-binding proteins enabled the microscopic detection and isolation of B. anthracis directly from soil samples. These environmental isolates were genotyped and found to be identical to BF-5 in terms of SNPs. Therefore, it seems that the BF-5 genotype is currently the prevalent one at the affected premises. The area contaminated by the cadaver was subsequently disinfected with formaldehyde.

Indexed as

AnthraxBacillus anthracisAnimalsCattleFemaleHumansPlasmidsSoilVirulenceSoilanthraxBacillus anthracisdetection assayoutbreakphylogenetics

Identifiers

PMID35195442
PMCPMC8925895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.