Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35195418›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2022

Combined Free-Energy Calculation and Machine Learning Methods for Understanding Ligand Unbinding Kinetics.

Magd Badaoui, Pedro J Buigues, Dénes Berta, Gaurav M Mandana, Hankang Gu, Tamás Földes, Callum J Dickson, Viktor Hornak, Mitsunori Kato, Carla Molteni and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Surface-Accelerated String Method for Locating Minimum Free Energy Paths.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  9. DPA-2: a large atomic model as a multi-task learner.npj computational materials · 2024
    Article
  10. How Robust Is the Ligand Binding Transition State?Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Magd BadaouiDepartment of Chemistry, King's College London, London SE1 1DB, United Kingdom.
Pedro J BuiguesDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Dénes BertaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8299-3784
Gaurav M MandanaDepartment of Chemistry, King's College London, London SE1 1DB, United Kingdom.
Hankang GuDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Tamás FöldesDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Callum J DicksonComputer-Aided Drug Discovery, Global Discovery Chemistry, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, 181 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4013-6394
Viktor HornakComputer-Aided Drug Discovery, Global Discovery Chemistry, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, 181 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2344-9586
Mitsunori KatoComputer-Aided Drug Discovery, Global Discovery Chemistry, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, 181 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.
Carla MolteniDepartment of Physics, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0402-2376
Simon ParsonsSchool of Computer Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, United Kingdom.
Edina RostaDepartment of Chemistry, King's College London, London SE1 1DB, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9823-4766

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The determination of drug residence times, which define the time an inhibitor is in complex with its target, is a fundamental part of the drug discovery process. Synthesis and experimental measurements of kinetic rate constants are, however, expensive and time consuming. In this work, we aimed to obtain drug residence times computationally. Furthermore, we propose a novel algorithm to identify molecular design objectives based on ligand unbinding kinetics. We designed an enhanced sampling technique to accurately predict the free-energy profiles of the ligand unbinding process, focusing on the free-energy barrier for unbinding. Our method first identifies unbinding paths determining a corresponding set of internal coordinates (ICs) that form contacts between the protein and the ligand; it then iteratively updates these interactions during a series of biased molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to reveal the ICs that are important for the whole of the unbinding process. Subsequently, we performed finite-temperature string simulations to obtain the free-energy barrier for unbinding using the set of ICs as a complex reaction coordinate. Importantly, we also aimed to enable the further design of drugs focusing on improved residence times. To this end, we developed a supervised machine learning (ML) approach with inputs from unbiased "downhill" trajectories initiated near the transition state (TS) ensemble of the string unbinding path. We demonstrate that our ML method can identify key ligand-protein interactions driving the system through the TS. Some of the most important drugs for cancer treatment are kinase inhibitors. One of these kinase targets is cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2), an appealing target for anticancer drug development. Here, we tested our method using two different CDK2 inhibitors for the potential further development of these compounds. We compared the free-energy barriers obtained from our calculations with those observed in available experimental data. We highlighted important interactions at the distal ends of the ligands that can be targeted for improved residence times. Our method provides a new tool to determine unbinding rates and to identify key structural features of the inhibitors that can be used as starting points for novel design strategies in drug discovery.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMolecular Dynamics SimulationKineticsLigandsProtein BindingLigands

Identifiers

PMID35195418
PMCPMC9097281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.