Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35195281›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2022

Pragmatic Trials in Long-Term Care: Implementation and Dissemination Challenges and Opportunities.

Cari Levy, Sheryl Zimmerman, Vincent Mor, David Gifford, Sherry A Greenberg, Juliet Holt Klinger, Cathy Lieblich, Sunny Linnebur, Angie McAllister, Arif Nazir and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Cari LevyDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7485-280X
Sheryl ZimmermanCecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Vincent MorCenter of Innovation in Long-term Services and Supports, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA.
David GiffordCenter for Health Policy Evaluation, American Health Care Association, Washington, DC, USA.
Sherry A GreenbergSeton Hall University College of Nursing, Nutley, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6311-2331
Juliet Holt KlingerBrookdale Senior Living, Brentwood, TN, USA.
Cathy LieblichPioneer Network, Rochester, NY, USA.
Sunny LinneburUniversity of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Angie McAllisterSignature HealthCARE, Louisville, KY, USA.
Arif NazirSignature HealthCARE, Louisville, KY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7211-7561
Douglas PaceAlzheimer's Association, Chicago, IL, USA.
Robyn StoneLeadingAge, Washington, DC, USA.
Barbara ResnickUniversity of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Philip D SloaneCecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Joseph OuslanderDepartment of Integrated Medical Sciences, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Joseph E GauglerDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

Pragmatic Trials to Improve Care and Outcomes for Persons with Dementia in Long-Term CareR13AG067681 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ZIMMERMAN, SHERYL · 2020 to 2020
$50k
NIA NIH HHS R13 AG067681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials are considered the most rigorous research design in efficacy and effectiveness research; however, such trials present numerous challenges that limit their applicability in real-world settings. As a consequence, pragmatic trials are increasingly viewed as a research design that overcomes some of these barriers with the potential to produce findings that are more reproducible. Although pragmatic methodology in long-term care is receiving increasing attention as an approach to improve successful dissemination and implementation, pragmatic trials present complexities of their own. To address these complexities and related issues, experts with experience conducting pragmatic trials, developing nursing home policy, participating in advocacy efforts, and providing clinical care in long-term care settings participated in a virtual consensus conference funded by the National Institute on Aging in Spring 2021. Participants identified 4 cross-cutting principles key to dissemination and implementation of pragmatic trial interventions: (1) stakeholder engagement, (2) diversity and inclusion, (3) organizational strain and readiness, and (4) learn from adaptations. Participants emphasized that implementation processes must be grounded in the perspectives of the people who will ultimately be responsible for implementing the intervention once it is proven to be effective. In addition, messaging must speak to long-term care staff and all others who have a stake in its outcomes. Although our understanding of dissemination and implementation strategies remains underdeveloped, this article is designed to guide long-term care researchers and community providers who are increasingly aware of the need for pragmatism in disseminating and implementing evidence-based care interventions.

Indexed as

Nursing HomesPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicHumansLong-Term CareStakeholder Participationdisseminationimplementationpragmatic trials

Identifiers

PMID35195281
PMCPMC8944211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.