ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2022
Understanding barriers and facilitators to voluntary medical male circumcision and Spear and Shield uptake in Zambian community health centers.
Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissemination and implementation of an evidence-based voluntary medical male circumcision program: The Spear & Shield program.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Zambian Parents' Perspectives on Early-Infant Versus Early-Adolescent Male Circumcision.AIDS and behavior · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) has been an effective method for reducing the risk of HIV transmission by 50%-70% in Eastern and Southern Africa. The Spear and Shield (S&S) program is a community health center (CHC)-based biobehavioral VMMC HIV prevention intervention that increased VMMC uptake in male CHC attendees in Lusaka, Zambia. Qualitative data organized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) has been used to characterize factors that may impact S&S/VMMC implementation. This manuscript uses the CFIR to examine S&S implementation across 96 CHCs in four Zambian provinces using a mixed-methods approach to (a) quantify successful S&S implementation; (b) understand how CFIR domains might provide insight into the degree of implemental success; (c) identify major themes among least and most successful CHCs; and (d) help guide future prevention efforts and policy related to VMMC promotion in the Zambian CHC context. In contrast with CFIR quantitative analyses, 12 major qualitative themes associated with the least and most successful CHCs provided unique insight into S&S and VMMC implementation and guidance for future implementation studies. Themes included lack of resources (staff, space, transportation) for the former and strong staff relationships and active community engagement for the latter. The CFIR framework appears extremely useful for the identification of qualitative themes related to intervention implementation, and reduction of qualitative data for quantitative analyses may sacrifice more nuanced information. Consideration of CFIR themes may be useful to inform HIV prevention strategies in Zambia and similar contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.