Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35195055›Full record

ReviewCognitive behaviour therapy2022

Be brave, BE-FIT! A pilot investigation of an ACT-informed exposure intervention to reduce exercise fear-avoidance in older adults.

Samantha G Farris, Mindy M Kibbey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cognitive behaviour therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. A Confirmatory Factory Analysis of the Exercise Sensitivity Questionnaire (ESQ).Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Psychological and behavioral dimensions in cardiac arrest survivors and their families: A state-of-the-art review.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samantha G FarrisRutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 53 Avenue E, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2567-2463
Mindy M KibbeyRutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 53 Avenue E, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4188-3669

Funding

Development of a novel exercise threat attentional bias assayR01AG070136 · NIA · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI FARRIS, SAMANTHA GWEN · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG070136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exercise sensitivity, fear of physical sensations of exertion, is particularly elevated in individuals with cardiovascular disease and can promote fear-avoidance of physical activity. We developed an ACT-informed exposure intervention to target exercise sensitivity, called Behavioral Exposure For Interoceptive Tolerance (BE-FIT). In this Stage I pilot trial, we developed and evaluated the feasibility, safety, and initial efficacy of BE-FIT in low active patients with elevated exercise sensitivity enrolled in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. BE-FIT is a 6-session, manualized, program-adjunctive treatment delivered during the initial weeks of cardiac rehabilitation and involves exposure to feared bodily sensations and exercise situations, bolstered by acceptance and values-focused processes. Patients (

Indexed as

ExerciseFearAgedExercise TherapyHumansPilot Projectsacceptance and commitment therapyExercise sensitivityinteroceptive exposurekinesiophobia

Identifiers

PMID35195055
PMCPMC8986621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.