Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35194946›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022

Assessment of a novel commercial large field of view phantom for comprehensive MR imaging quality assurance of a 0.35T MRgRT system.

Benjamin C Lewis, Jaeik Shin, Borna Maraghechi, Benjamin Quinn, Mike Cole, Enzo Barberi, Jin Sung Kim, Olga Green, Taeho Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of QUASAR Insight Phantom for daily imaging QA of MRgRT linacs.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Benjamin C LewisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Jaeik ShinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Borna MaraghechiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Benjamin QuinnModus Medical Devices Inc., London, Ontario, Canada.
Mike ColeModus Medical Devices Inc., London, Ontario, Canada.
Enzo BarberiModus Medical Devices Inc., London, Ontario, Canada.
Jin Sung KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Olga GreenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Taeho KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Washington University in St. Louis · USThe Medical Device (United Kingdom) · GBYonsei University · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)the Korea government (MSIT) 2020R1A4A101661911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consistent quality assurance (QA) programs are vital to MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT), for ensuring treatment is delivered accurately and the onboard MRI system is providing the expected image quality. However, daily imaging QA with a dedicated phantom is not common at many MRgRT centers, especially with large phantoms that cover a field of view (FOV), similar to the human torso. This work presents the first clinical experience with a purpose-built phantom for large FOV daily and periodic comprehensive quality assurance (QUASAR™ MRgRT Insight Phantom (beta)) from Modus Medical Devices Inc. (Modus QA) on an MRgRT system. A monthly American College of Radiology (ACR) QA phantom was also imaged for reference. Both phantoms were imaged on a 0.35T MR-Linac, a 1.5T Philips wide bore MRI, and a 3.0T Siemens MRI, with T1-weighted and T2-weighted acquisitions. The Insight phantom was imaged in axial and sagittal orientations. Image quality tests including geometric accuracy, spatial resolution accuracy, slice thickness accuracy, slice position accuracy, and image intensity uniformity were performed on each phantom, following their respective instruction manuals. The geometric distortion test showed similar distortions of -1.7 mm and -1.9 mm across a 190 mm and a 283 mm lengths for the ACR and MRgRT Insight phantoms, respectively. The MRgRT Insight phantom utilized a modulation transform function (MTF) for spatial resolution evaluation, which showed decreased performance on the lower B

Indexed as

Radiotherapy, Image-GuidedHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingParticle AcceleratorsPhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID35194946
PMCPMC8992932
OpenAlexW4213368534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.