Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35194736›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2022

Rethinking Clinical Trial Radiology Workflows and Student Training: Integrated Virtual Student Shadowing Experience, Education, and Evaluation.

Lillian G Spear, Jane A Dimperio, Sherry S Wang, Huy M Do, Les R Folio

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lillian G SpearNIH CC Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. lillispear@verizon.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8723-4189
Jane A DimperioNIH CC Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Sherry S WangUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Huy M DoDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Les R FolioSenior Member, Diagnostic Imaging & Interventional Radiology Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of South Florida · USUniversity of Utah · USVerizon (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is consistent demand for clinical exposure from students interested in radiology; however, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in fewer available options and limited student access to radiology departments. Additionally, there is increased demand for radiologists to manage more complex quantification in reports on patients enrolled in clinical trials. We present an online educational curriculum that addresses both of these gaps by virtually immersing students (radiology preprocessors, or RPs) into radiologists' workflows where they identify and measure target lesions in advance of radiologists, streamlining report quantification. RPs switched to remote work at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in our National Institutes of Health (NIH). We accommodated them by transitioning our curriculum on cross-sectional anatomy and advanced PACS tools to a publicly available online curriculum. We describe collaborations between multiple academic research centers and industry through contributions of academic content to this curriculum. Further, we describe how we objectively assess educational effectiveness with cross-sectional anatomical quizzes and decreasing RP miss rates as they gain experience. Our RP curriculum generated significant interest evidenced by a dozen academic and research institutes providing online presentations including radiology modality basics and quantification in clinical trials. We report a decrease in RP miss rate percentage, including one virtual RP over a period of 1 year. Results reflect training effectiveness through decreased discrepancies with radiologist reports and improved tumor identification over time. We present our RP curriculum and multicenter experience as a pilot experience in a clinical trial research setting. Students are able to obtain useful clinical radiology experience in a virtual learning environment by immersing themselves into a clinical radiologist's workflow. At the same time, they help radiologists improve patient care with more valuable quantitative reports, previously shown to improve radiologist efficiency. Students identify and measure lesions in clinical trials before radiologists, and then review their reports for self-evaluation based on included measurements from the radiologists. We consider our virtual approach as a supplement to student education while providing a model for how artificial intelligence will improve patient care with more consistent quantification while improving radiologist efficiency.

Indexed as

COVID-19RadiologyArtificial IntelligenceCurriculumHumansPandemicsStudentsWorkflowArtificial intelligenceComputed tomographyMedical educationTumor quantification

Identifiers

PMID35194736
PMCPMC8863390
OpenAlexW4213436966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.