Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35194696›Full record

ArticleHealth & justice2022

Assessing incarcerated women's physical and mental health status and needs in a Swiss prison: a cross-sectional study.

Aurélie Augsburger, Céline Neri, Patrick Bodenmann, Bruno Gravier, Véronique Jaquier, Carole Clair

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & justice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. County health rankings, provider shortages, and the health of incarcerated women with opioid use disorder.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aurélie AugsburgerCentre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Training, Research and Innovation, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Céline NeriService of Correctional Medicine and Psychiatry, University Hospital of Lausanne CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Patrick BodenmannCentre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Vulnerabilities and Social Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bruno GravierService of Correctional Medicine and Psychiatry, University Hospital of Lausanne CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Véronique Jaquier *Centre for Criminological Research (CRRC), University of Neuchâtel, & School of Health Sciences Fribourg (HEdS-FR), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Neuchâtel/Fribourg, Switzerland.
Carole Clair *Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Training, Research and Innovation, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. carole.clair@unisante.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5281-0943
Centre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne · CHUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen make up 5% of the European prison population on average. Almost invisible in prison and health research, and suffering the stigma associated with female offending, incarcerated women are often forgotten, and their specific healthcare needs remain much ignored. Combining face-to-face survey interviews and medical chart data, we aim to assess the health status, healthcare needs, and access to preventive medicine of women incarcerated in Switzerland.

resultsSixty incarcerated adult women participated in a cross-sectional study to assess their life and incarceration histories, physical and mental health problems, medication, and use of medical services. Eligibility criteria were (a) an incarceration of at least four weeks and (b) the ability to provide written informed consent. Exclusion criteria were psychiatric instability and insufficient language competence. Women's average age was 34.3 years old (SD = 9.8); 45.0% of them were born in Switzerland, 33.3% in Europe and 15.0% on the African continent. Overall, 61.7% of women self-reported physical or mental health problems and 13.3% indicated they were once diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection. Further, 78.3% of women were active cigarette smokers; more than one in three women reported alcohol use problems and almost one in two women had used at least one illicit drug in the year before incarceration. Depression and perceived stress scores were above clinical cut-off points for more than half of interviewed women. When asked how they rated their health, 68.3% of women felt it had worsened since incarceration. All but four women had accessed prison medical services; however, our study does not indicate whether women's use of healthcare was indeed adequate to their needs.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated incarcerated women's poor health and health-risk behaviours. Structural changes and gender-responsive health promotion interventions have the potential to improve the health of incarcerated women and help them return to the community in better health.

Indexed as

DisparitiesGenderIncarcerated womenPrisonWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID35194696
PMCPMC8864867
OpenAlexW4212922573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.