ArticleClinical oral investigations2022
Accuracy of different dental age estimation methods for determining the legal majority of 18 years in the Turkish population.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid approach with convolutional neural network and regression models for age estimation in panoramic radiographs.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Observational
- Assessment of periodontal ligament visibility in third molars for threshold-based forensic age estimation: a cross-sectional study in a Turkish population.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Third molar maturity on panoramic radiographs as an indicator of the 18-year threshold: a pilot cases study.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- Demirjian's and Cameriere's methods for estimating the 18-year legal age threshold using third molar maturity in a Northern Thai population.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Dental Versus Skeletal Methods for Age Estimation in Growing Individuals: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Radiologic assessment of third molar development and cervical vertebral maturation to validate age of majority in a Mexican population.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Article
- Bridging gaps in age estimation: a cross-sectional comparative study of skeletal maturation using Fishman method and dental development using Nolla method among Egyptians.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Article
- Age estimation at 18-year threshold: comparing Demirjian and Cameriere's methods for Thais.The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology · 2024Article
- Predicting chronological age of 14 or 18 in adolescents: integrating dental assessments with machine learning.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- Forensic Dental Age Estimation: Development of New Algorithm Based on the Minimal Necessary Databases.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Accuracy of age estimation and assessment of the 18-year threshold based on second and third molar maturity in Koreans and Japanese.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesRadiographic evaluation of the third molar maturation is used to estimate dental age, especially in adolescence. This study aimed to assess the application of three age estimation methods (Cameriere's third molar maturity index (I MATERIALS AND
methodsThe dental age was estimated using the I
resultsLogistic regression analysis showed that sex and each estimation method were statistically significant in discriminating adults and minors (p < 0.05). In the case-wise comparison for estimate adulthood, both Demirjian's stages and I
conclusionsCameriere's I CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In forensic medicine and legal practices, Cameriere's I
Indexed as
Identifiers
35194681What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.