Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35194664›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2022

Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer meeting the expanded criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hyo-Joon Yang, Jie-Hyun Kim, Na Won Kim, Il Ju Choi

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Development ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hyo-Joon Yang *Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jie-Hyun Kim *Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Na Won KimYonsei University Medical Library, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Il Ju ChoiCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang, Gyeonggi, 10408, Republic of Korea. cij1224@ncc.re.kr.
Gangnam Severance Hospital · KRKangbuk Samsung Hospital · KRNational Cancer Center · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere have been concerns over the long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer (UD EGC). We aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of ESD and surgery for patients with UD EGC.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through March 2021 to identify studies that compared the long-term outcomes of ESD and surgery for UD EGC meeting expanded criteria for curative resection. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool for non-randomized studies. The risk ratio (RR) was estimated using a fixed-effect model.

resultsOverall, 1863 patients from five retrospective cohort studies, including 908 patients with propensity score matching (PSM), were eligible for meta-analysis. ESD was associated with inferior overall survival (OS) compared to surgery in the overall cohort (RR 2.11; 95% CI 1.26-3.55) but not in the PSM cohort (RR 1.18; 95% CI 0.60-2.32). In the PSM cohort, ESD had a lower disease-free survival (DFS) (RR 2.49; 95% CI 1.42-4.35) and higher recurrence (RR 12.61; 95% CI 3.43-46.37), gastric recurrence (RR 11.25; 95% CI 3.06-41.40), and extragastric recurrence (RR 4.23; 95% CI 0.47-37.93). Recurrence outcomes were similar between the overall and PSM cohorts. Disease-specific survival was not significantly different between the two groups in both the overall and PSM cohorts.

conclusionAlthough OS after curative ESD for UD EGC was not different from that after surgery in the PSM cohort, DFS and recurrence were inferior after ESD. Limitations included a lack of randomized trials. Further prospective studies comparing the long-term outcomes of ESD and surgery for UD EGC are needed (PROSPERO CRD 42021237097).

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionStomach NeoplasmsGastric MucosaHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEndoscopic submucosal dissectionStomach neoplasmsSurgerySystematic reviewUndifferentiated histology

Identifiers

PMID35194664
PMCPMC9085673
OpenAlexW4213340041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.