ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2022
Magnetotactic bacteria: concepts, conundrums, and insights from a novel in situ approach using digital holographic microscopy (DHM).
Review in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering Magnetotactic Bacteria as Medical Microrobots.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Therapeutic Innovations in Nanomedicine: Exploring the Potential of Magnetotactic Bacteria and Bacterial Magnetosomes.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Biominerals and Bioinspired Materials in Biosensing: Recent Advancements and Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Magnetosomes as Potential Nanocarriers for Cancer Treatment.Current drug delivery · 2024Review
- Magnetosensation.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetotactic bacteria (MTB) are a diverse group of highly motile Gram-negative microorganisms with the common ability to orient along magnetic field lines, a behavior known as magnetotaxis. Ubiquitous in aquatic sediment environments, MTB are often microaerophilic and abundant at the oxic/anoxic interface. Magnetic field sensing is accomplished using intracellular, membrane-encased, iron-containing minerals known as magnetosomes. The chemistry, morphology and arrangement of magnetosomes differs substantially among different MTB. Although magnetic field sensing mechanisms, genetic bases and protein functions have been elucidated in select model organisms such as the Magnetospirillum strains and Desulfovibrio RS-1, not all findings are applicable to diverse clades of MTB. As the number of identified species has increased, it has become evident that many of the characteristics and mechanisms once presumed to be prototypical of MTB are in fact not universal. Here we present a general overview of the current state of MTB research for readers outside of the realm of prokaryotic research, focusing on recent discoveries, knowledge gaps and future directions. In addition, we report new insights acquired using holographic technology to observe and quantify microbial responses in magnetic fields that are earth-strength or weaker, providing a new ecophysiological approach to in situ MTB research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35194649What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.