Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35194597›Full record

ArticleResearch square2022

Perceptions of COVID-19 Self-Testing and Recommendations for Implementation and Scale up Among Black/African Americans: Implications for the COVID-19 STEP Project.

Ucheoma Nwaozuru, Chisom Obiezu-Umeh, Hassim Diallo, Danielle Graham, Guy-Lucien Whembolua, Marie Janeeca Bourgeau, Tiarney Ritchwood, LaRon E Nelson, Thembekile Shato, Allison Mathews and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.

Ucheoma NwaozuruWake Forest School of Medicine.
Chisom Obiezu-UmehSaint Louis University.
Hassim DialloUniversity of Maryland, College Park.
Danielle GrahamUniversity of Cincinnati.
Guy-Lucien WhemboluaUniversity of Cincinnati.
Marie Janeeca BourgeauQueens College, CUNY.
Tiarney RitchwoodDuke University.
LaRon E NelsonYale University.
Thembekile ShatoWashington University in Saint Louis.
Allison MathewsWake Forest University.
Rhoda MoiseRhoda Moise, LLC.
Maranda C WardGeorge Washington University.
Jocelyn RaudeÉcole des Hautes Études en Santé Publique.
Aima A AhonkhaiVanderbilt University Medical Center.
Diane J YoungPrince George's County Health Department.
Donaldson F ConserveGeorge Washington University.
George Washington University · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USWake Forest University · USDuke University · USÉcole des Hautes Études en Santé Publique · FRMontpellier Interdisciplinary center on Sustainable Agri-food systems: social and nutritional sciences · FRPrince George's County Health Department · USQueens College, CUNY · USUCLouvain Saint-Louis Brussels · BEUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · USYale University · US

Funding

Training Program for Scientists Conducting Research to Reduce HIV Health DisparitR25MH067127 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Emily A Arnold, Torsten Brian Neilands · 2003 to 2026
$5.4M
UAB Public Health/Biomedical Research Training ProgramT37MD001448 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI JOLLY, PAULINE EVADNE · 2005 to 2024
$4.8M
HIV Intervention Science Training Program for Underserved Investigators R25MH080665 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI EL-BASSEL, NABILA, WU, ELWIN · 2007 to 2023
$2.8M
Acceptability and Feasibility of Unsupervised HIV Self-Testing Among Networks of Men in TanzaniaR00MH110343 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI CONSERVE, DONALDSON · 2018 to 2020
$765k
NIMHD NIH HHS T37 MD001448NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH110343NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH067127NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background COVID-19 self-testing (ST) is an innovative strategy with the potential to increase the access and uptake of testing and ultimately to limit the spread of the virus. To maximize the uptake and reach of this promising strategy and inform intervention development and scale up, research is needed to understand the acceptability of and willingness to use this tool. This is vital to ensure that Black/African Americans are reached by the Biden-Harris Administration’s free national COVID-19 ST program. This study aimed to explore the acceptability and recommendations to promote and scale up the uptake of COVID-19 ST among Black/African Americans. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study using a semi-structured survey to assess barriers and facilitators to the uptake of COVID-19 ST among a convenience sample of 28 self-identified Black/African Americans from schools, community centers, and faith-based institutions in Ohio and Maryland. Inductive content analysis was conducted to identify categories and subcategories related to acceptability and recommendations for implementing and scaling up COVID-19 ST in communities. Results Participants perceived COVID-19 self-testing as an acceptable tool that is beneficial to prevent transmission and address some of the barriers associated with health facility testing, such as transportation cost and human contact at the health facility. However, concerns were raised regarding the accurate use of the kits and costs. Recommendations for implementing and scaling up COVID-19 ST included engagement of community stakeholders to disseminate information about COVID-19 self-testing and creating culturally appropriate education tools to promote knowledge of and clear instructions about how to properly use COVID-19 ST kits. Based on these recommendations, the COVID-19 STEP (Self-Testing Education and Promotion) Project is being developed and will involve engaging community partners such as barbers, church leaders, and other community-based organizations to increase the uptake and use of free COVID-19 ST kits among Black/African Americans. Conclusion Findings showed that most participants considered COVID-19 ST valuable for encouraging COVID-19 testing. However, cost and accuracy concerns may pose barriers. Future work should consider implementing interventions that leverage the benefits of COVID-19 ST and further assess the extent to which these identified facilitators and barriers may influence COVID-19 ST uptake.

Identifiers

PMID35194597
PMCPMC8863154
OpenAlexW4213089231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.