Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35194402›Full record

ArticleJournal of material cycles and waste management2021

Evaluation of biomass pretreatment to optimize process factors for different organic acids via Box-Behnken RSM method.

Çağdaş Gönen, Ece Ümmü Deveci, Nagehan Akter Önal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of material cycles and waste management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Çağdaş GönenDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University Campus, 51240 Niğde, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-8554-8125
Ece Ümmü DeveciDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University Campus, 51240 Niğde, Turkey.
Nagehan Akter ÖnalDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University Campus, 51240 Niğde, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomass, as renewable energy source, is of importance to investigate to extend the conversion yield by microorganism. Because of lignocellulosic structure, biomass must be pretreated with a process, frequently inorganic acid has to be used with a problem of hazardous byproducts. Organic acid pretreatment is an efficient alternative to be investigated. Sugar beet pulp, as an agro-industrial residue of microorganism, can be utilized by pretreatment, which is usually a costly process. Pretreatment with organic acids creates a great opportunity to convert the process into more economic and effective. Moreover, pressure conditions significantly increase the yield of biodegradable sugar content. In this study, different organic acids of maleic, fumaric, oxalic, and acetic acid pretreatment was investigated to pretreatment of sugar beet pulp, which came vast amount from factories, under pressure and non-pressure conditions via Box-Behnken method to estimate optimum point of acid ratio (1, 3, 5%), time (10, 27.5, 45 min), and solid ratio factors (3, 6.5, 10%) for highest degradation. Results were also evaluated economically. As a result of the experiments, it was observed that acetic acid gave the best result with 409.16 g/L total sugar concentration than the other organic acids. The highest TS concentration of maleic, oxalic, and fumaric acid were 97.26, 97.85, and 91.37 g/L, respectively, under pressure. According to economical evaluation, owing to lower market price and highest TS formation yield, pretreatment cost of acetic acid pretreatment was found averagely 1.51 $/gTS under pressure conditions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10163-021-01276-7.

Indexed as

BiomassBox–BehnkenOrganic acidPretreatmentSugar cane pulp

Identifiers

PMID35194402
PMCPMC8295973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.