Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35194162›Full record

SynthesisPediatric research2024

Cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring (NIRS) in children and adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Mathias Lühr Hansen, Simon Hyttel-Sørensen, Janus Christian Jakobsen, Christian Gluud, Elisabeth M W Kooi, Jonathan Mintzer, Willem P de Boode, Monica Fumagalli, Ana Alarcon, Thomas Alderliesten and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. 2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 20 institutions in 13 countries.

Mathias Lühr HansenDepartment of Neonatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. mathias.luhr.hansen@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1957-7005
Simon Hyttel-SørensenDepartment of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Janus Christian JakobsenCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian GluudCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Elisabeth M W KooiDivision of Neonatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Jonathan MintzerDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Newborn Medicine, Mountainside Medical Center, Montclair, NJ, USA.
Willem P de BoodeDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Monica FumagalliFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milano, Italy.
Ana AlarconDepartment of Neonatology, Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Passeig de Sant Joan de Deu 2, 08950, Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Thomas AlderliestenDepartment of Neonatology, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Gorm GreisenDepartment of Neonatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
European Society for Paediatric Research Special Interest Group ‘NearInfraRed Spectroscopy’ (NIRS)
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKMedical University of Graz · ATRadboud University Nijmegen · NLGazi University · TRUniversity College Cork · IEUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKBaylor College of Medicine · USBoston Children's Hospital · USCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBHackensack University Medical Center Mountainside · USHospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESHudson Institute of Medical Research · AUKU Leuven · BENorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

Aage and Johanne Louis-Hansen FoundationSafeBoosC-III projectSvend Andersen Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCerebral oxygenation monitoring utilising near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is increasingly used to guide interventions in clinical care. The objective of this systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis is to evaluate the effects of clinical care with access to cerebral NIRS monitoring in children and adults versus care without.

methodsThis review conforms to PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020202986). Methods are outlined in our protocol (doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01660-2).

resultsTwenty-five randomised clinical trials were included (2606 participants). All trials were at a high risk of bias. Two trials assessed the effects of NIRS during neonatal intensive care, 13 during cardiac surgery, 9 during non-cardiac surgery and 1 during neurocritical care. Meta-analyses showed no significant difference for all-cause mortality (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.51-1.10; 1489 participants; I

conclusionThe evidence on the effects of clinical care with access to cerebral NIRS monitoring is very uncertain. IMPACT: The evidence of the effects of cerebral NIRS versus no NIRS monitoring are very uncertain for mortality, neuroprotection, and serious adverse events. Additional trials to obtain sufficient information size, focusing on lowering bias risk, are required. The first attempt to systematically review randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of cerebral NIRS monitoring by pooling data across various clinical settings. Despite pooling data across clinical settings, study interpretation was not substantially impacted by heterogeneity. We have insufficient evidence to support or reject the clinical use of cerebral NIRS monitoring.

Indexed as

BrainMonitoring, PhysiologicSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredAdultChildHumansInfant, NewbornRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID35194162
PMCPMC11502593
OpenAlexW4213073304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.