ArticleGenome research2022
Predicting genotype-specific gene regulatory networks.
Article in Genome research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- BLOBFISH: bipartite limited subnetworks from multiple observations using breadth-first search with constrained hops.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Large-scale, interpretable gene regulatory network inference through biologically informed matrix factorization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Multimodal bioinformatic analyses of genome-scale expression beyond gene-centric differential expression.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Exploring potential transcription factors and their regulatory relationships based on asymmetric covariance natural vector encoding method and machine learning algorithms.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Bayesian inference of sample-specific coexpression networks.Genome research · 2024Article
- Identify Regulatory eQTLs by Multiome Sequencing in Prostate Single Cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Current and future directions in network biology.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Single-sample network modeling on omics data.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Bayesian Optimized sample-specific Networks Obtained By Omics data (BONOBO).bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- The Network Zoo: a multilingual package for the inference and analysis of gene regulatory networks.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Network-based approaches for modeling disease regulation and progression.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Smart software untangles gene regulation in cells.Nature · 2022Article
- Molecular Modelling Hurdle in the Next-Generation Sequencing Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- The use of machine learning to discover regulatory networks controlling biological systems.Molecular cell · 2022Review
- Connections for Matters of the Heart: Network Medicine in Cardiovascular Diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how each person's unique genotype influences their individual patterns of gene regulation has the potential to improve our understanding of human health and development, and to refine genotype-specific disease risk assessments and treatments. However, the effects of genetic variants are not typically considered when constructing gene regulatory networks, despite the fact that many disease-associated genetic variants are thought to have regulatory effects, including the disruption of transcription factor (TF) binding. We developed EGRET (Estimating the Genetic Regulatory Effect on TFs), which infers a genotype-specific gene regulatory network for each individual in a study population. EGRET begins by constructing a genotype-informed TF-gene prior network derived using TF motif predictions, expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) data, individual genotypes, and the predicted effects of genetic variants on TF binding. It then uses a technique known as message passing to integrate this prior network with gene expression and TF protein-protein interaction data to produce a refined, genotype-specific regulatory network. We used EGRET to infer gene regulatory networks for two blood-derived cell lines and identified genotype-associated, cell line-specific regulatory differences that we subsequently validated using allele-specific expression, chromatin accessibility QTLs, and differential ChIP-seq TF binding. We also inferred EGRET networks for three cell types from each of 119 individuals and identified cell type-specific regulatory differences associated with diseases related to those cell types. EGRET is, to our knowledge, the first method that infers networks reflective of individual genetic variation in a way that provides insight into the genetic regulatory associations driving complex phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.