Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35193926›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

Emotion Downregulation Targets Interoceptive Brain Regions While Emotion Upregulation Targets Other Affective Brain Regions.

Jungwon Min, Kaoru Nashiro, Hyun Joo Yoo, Christine Cho, Padideh Nasseri, Shelby L Bachman, Shai Porat, Julian F Thayer, Catie Chang, Tae-Ho Lee and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Distinct Brain Systems Support Afferent and Efferent Autonomic Activity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Distinct brain systems support afferent and efferent autonomic activity.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jungwon MinUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089.
Kaoru NashiroUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089.
Hyun Joo YooUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089.
Christine ChoUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089.
Padideh NasseriUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089.
Shelby L BachmanUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089.ORCID 0000-0002-4460-4661
Shai PoratUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089.
Julian F ThayerUniversity of California, Irvine, California 92697.
Catie ChangVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235.
Tae-Ho LeeVirginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061.
Mara MatherUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089 mara.mather@usc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4331-6112
University of Southern California · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USVanderbilt University · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

Why Does Heart Rate Variability Matter for Emotion RegulationR01AG057184 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MATHER, MARA · 2017 to 2021
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers generally agree that when upregulating and downregulating emotion, control regions in the prefrontal cortex turn up or down activity in affect-generating brain areas. However, the "affective dial hypothesis" that turning up and down emotions produces opposite effects in the same affect-generating regions is untested. We tested this hypothesis by examining the overlap between the regions activated during upregulation and those deactivated during downregulation in 54 male and 51 female humans. We found that upregulation and downregulation both recruit regulatory regions, such as the inferior frontal gyrus and dorsal anterior cingulate gyrus, but act on distinct affect-generating regions. Upregulation increased activity in regions associated with emotional experience, such as the amygdala, anterior insula, striatum, and anterior cingulate gyrus as well as in regions associated with sympathetic vascular activity, such as periventricular white matter, while downregulation decreased activity in regions receiving interoceptive input, such as the posterior insula and postcentral gyrus. Nevertheless, participants' subjective sense of emotional intensity was associated with activity in overlapping brain regions (dorsal anterior cingulate, insula, thalamus, and frontal pole) across upregulation and downregulation. These findings indicate that upregulation and downregulation rely on overlapping brain regions to control and assess emotions but target different affect-generating brain regions.

Indexed as

EmotionsMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainBrain MappingDown-RegulationFemaleHumansMaleUp-RegulationarousaldownregulationemotionfMRIinteroceptionupregulation

Identifiers

PMID35193926
PMCPMC8985868
OpenAlexW4213304810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.