Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35193918›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Hypertension in the South African public healthcare system: a cost-of-illness and burden of disease study.

Ciaran N Kohli-Lynch, Agnes Erzse, B Rayner, Karen J Hofman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Hypertension guideline implementation and blood pressure control in Matlosana, South Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ciaran N Kohli-LynchSAMRC/Wits Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science, PRICELESS, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Sciences, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa ciaran.kohli-lynch@northwestern.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5516-1862
Agnes ErzseSAMRC/Wits Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science, PRICELESS, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Sciences, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
B RaynerDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.
Karen J HofmanSAMRC/Wits Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science, PRICELESS, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Sciences, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
South African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo quantify the health and economic burden of hypertension in the South African public healthcare system.

settingAll inpatient, outpatient and rehabilitative care received in the national public healthcare system.

participantsAdults, aged ≥20 years, who receive care in the public healthcare system. OUTCOMES: Worksheet-based models synthesised data from multiple sources to estimate the burden of disease, direct healthcare costs, and societal costs associated with hypertension. Results were disaggregated by sex.

resultsApproximately 8.22 million (30.8%, 95% CI 29.5% to 32.1%) South African adults with no private health insurance have hypertension. Hypertension was estimated to cause 14 000 (95% CI 11 100 to 17 200) ischaemic heart disease events, 13 300 (95% CI 10 600 to 16 300) strokes and 6100 (95% CI 4970 to 7460) cases of chronic kidney disease annually. Rates of hypertension, hypertension-related stroke and hypertension-related chronic kidney disease were greater for women compared with men.The direct healthcare costs associated with hypertension were estimated to be ZAR 10.1 billion (95% CI 8.98 to 11.3 billion) or US$0.711 billion (95% CI 0.633 to 0.793 billion). Societal costs were estimated to be ZAR 29.4 billion (95% CI 26.0 to 33.2 billion) or US$2.08 billion (95% CI 1.83 to 2.34 billion). Direct healthcare costs were greater for women (ZAR 6.11 billion or US$0.431 billion) compared with men (ZAR 3.97 billion or US$0.280 billion). Conversely, societal costs were lower for women (ZAR 10.5 billion or US$0.743 billion) compared with men (ZAR 18.9 billion or US$1.33 billion).

conclusionHypertension exerts a heavy health and economic burden on South Africa. Establishing cost-effective best practice guidelines for hypertension treatment requires further research. Such research will be essential if South Africa is to make progress in its efforts to implement universal healthcare.

Indexed as

HypertensionRenal Insufficiency, ChronicStrokeAdultCost of IllnessFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleSouth Africahealth economicshealth policyhypertension

Identifiers

PMID35193918
PMCPMC8867372
OpenAlexW4212988012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.