Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35193915›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Knowledge and use of lactational amenorrhoea as a family planning method among adolescent mothers in Uganda: a secondary analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys between 2006 and 2016.

Catherine Birabwa, Pamela Bakkabulindi, Solomon T Wafula, Peter Waiswa, Lenka Benova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Questionnaire-Based Study to Evaluate Health-Related Behaviors in 602 Women of Reproductive Age in Poland.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Catherine Birabwa *School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda cathybirabwa3@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2916-9275
Pamela Bakkabulindi *School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Solomon T WafulaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Peter WaiswaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Lenka BenovaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Makerere University · UGInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the level of knowledge and use of the lactational amenorrhoea method (LAM) among adolescents in Uganda between 2006 and 2016 using nationally representative data from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS).

designCross-sectional design involving analysis of three DHS (2006, 2011, and 2016) in Uganda.

settingThe data collection took place in Uganda. The DHS are nationally representative surveys on a wide range of indicators including contraception knowledge and use.

participantsA total of 1948 (2006), 2026 (2011) and 4276 (2016) adolescents (15-19 years) and 1662 (2006), 1666 (2011) and 3782 (2016) young women (20-24 years) were included. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Use of LAM among adolescents and young women with a live birth within 6 months before each survey.

resultsIn 2016, less than 1.0% (95% CI: 0.2% to 3.5%) of eligible adolescents correctly used LAM, and 56.3% (95% CI: 48.8% to 63.6%) were passively benefitting from LAM. The median duration of postpartum amenorrhoea (PPA) among adolescents in 2016 was 6.9 months, declining from 8.3 months in 2006. Compared with adolescents (56.7%), eligible young women had higher knowledge of LAM (64.1%) and higher median PPA duration (8.0 months) in 2016. The percentage of eligible adolescents who met the LAM criteria irrespective of whether they reported LAM use (were protected by LAM) decreased from 76.4% (95% CI: 66.5% to 84.0%) in 2006 to 57.2% (95% CI: 49.5% to 64.6%) in 2016. More than 50.0% (95% CI: 49.2% to 63.8%) of eligible adolescents were aware of LAM in 2016, increasing from 6.0% (95% CI: 2.5% to 13.8) in 2006.

conclusionDespite increasing awareness of LAM, reported and correct use of LAM was low among adolescents who could benefit from this method in Uganda, and declining over time. Support for adolescents to harness the benefits of correct LAM use should be increased. Additional research is needed to better understand the dynamics of LAM use in adolescents, including the transition to use of other modern contraceptive methods.

Indexed as

AmenorrheaFamily Planning ServicesAdolescentAdolescent MothersContraceptionCross-Sectional StudiesDemographyFemaleHumansLactationUgandapublic healthreproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID35193915
PMCPMC8867379
OpenAlexW4213205671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.