Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35193909›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

End-of-life care for people with severe mental illness: mixed methods systematic review and thematic synthesis of published case studies (the MENLOC study).

Michael Coffey, Deborah Edwards, Sally Anstey, Paul Gill, Mala Mann, Alan Meudell, Ben Hannigan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Delivering Palliative Care in Mental Health Nursing Settings: A Systematic Review.Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Challenges in the End-of-Life Care for Patients With Severe Persistent Mental Illness: A Case Series.Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael CoffeySchool of Health and Social Care, Swansea University, Swansea, West Glamorgan, UK m.j.coffey@swansea.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0380-4704
Deborah EdwardsSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1885-9297
Sally AnsteySchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2295-3761
Paul GillSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4056-3230
Mala MannUniversity Library Services, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2554-9265
Alan MeudellService User Consultant, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8138-4744
Ben HanniganSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2512-6721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPeople with severe mental illness (SMI) have significant comorbidities and reduced life expectancy. The objective of the review reported in this paper was to synthesise material from case studies relating to the organisation, provision and receipt of care for people with SMI who have an end-of-life (EoL) diagnosis.

designSystematic review and thematic synthesis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, HMIC, AMED, CINAHL, CENTRAL, ASSIA, DARE and Web of Science from inception to December 2019. Supplementary searching for additional material including grey literature along with 62 organisational websites.

resultsOf the 11 904 citations retrieved, 42 papers reporting 51 case studies were identified and are reported here. Twenty-five of the forty-two case study papers met seven, or more quality criteria, with eight meeting half or less. Attributes of case study subjects included that just over half were men, had a mean age of 55 years, psychotic illnesses dominated and the EoL condition was in most cases a cancer. Analysis generated themes as follows diagnostic delay and overshadowing, decision capacity and dilemmas, medical futility, individuals and their networks, care provision.

conclusionsIn the absence of high-quality intervention studies, this evidence synthesis indicates that cross disciplinary care is supported within the context of established therapeutic relationships. Attention to potential delay and diagnostic overshadowing is required in care provision. The values and preferences of individuals with severe mental illness experiencing an end-of-life condition should be recognised. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018108988.

Indexed as

Hospice CareMental DisordersTerminal CareDelayed DiagnosisHumansMaleMiddle Agedmental healthoncologyorganisation of health servicespalliative care

Identifiers

PMID35193909
PMCPMC8867317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.