ArticleDiagnostic microbiology and infectious disease2022
Evaluation of risk factors for uric acid elevation in COVID-19 patients treated with favipiravir.
Article in Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis and Modelling of Serum Uric Acid Dynamics in Patients Treated with Favipiravir.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Febuxostat may decrease the incidence of COVID-19 infection among patients with gout: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Identification of potential Indonesian marine invertebrate bioactive compounds as TMPRSS2 and SARS-CoV-2 Omicron spike protein inhibitors through computational screening.Arabian journal of chemistry · 2023Article
- Crosstalk between COVID-19 Infection and Kidney Diseases: A Review on the Metabolomic Approaches.Vaccines · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this retrospective study was to identify the clinical risk factor associated with uric acid elevation in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients treated with favipiravir. Uric acid elevation was defined as an unexplained increase of ≥1.5 times in the patient's uric acid level from baseline. Twenty-nine COVID-19 patients were included in the study. Uric acid elevation developed during favipiravir therapy in 12 (41.4%) patients and the median onset time was 4.5 days after starting favipiravir. In multiple logistic regression analysis, the favipiravir dosage (adjusted OR = 1.69 [1.02-2.81], P = 0.044) and younger patient age (adjusted OR = 0.91 [0.83-0.99], P = 0.040) were significant clinical risk factors for uric acid elevation. No significant between-group difference was noted in the uric acid elevation and non-elevation groups in the clinical recovery after favipiravir therapy. The uric acid levels of patients administered with favipiravir should be monitored closely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.