ArticleAnimal microbiome2022
Identification of bovine respiratory disease through the nasal microbiome.
Article in Animal microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of bovine respiratory disease on the respiratory microbiome: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Pooled it
- Detection of five viruses commonly implicated with bovine respiratory disease using loop-mediated isothermal amplification.The veterinary quarterly · 2026Article
- Nasopharyngeal microbiome and resistome profiles in dairy calves fed milk replacer with low-level β-lactams.JDS communications · 2026Article
- The calf holobiont under challenge: longitudinal microbiota-pathogen dynamics and respiratory health.Veterinary research · 2026Article
- Genomic characterization of Mycoplasma bovis, Mannheimia haemolytica, and bovine viral diarrhea virus 1 from a bovine respiratory disease complex case.BMC genomic data · 2026Article
- Characterizing the nasopharyngeal microbiome and resistome of dairy cattle with and without bovine respiratory disease.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Bovine Respiratory Mycoplasmas and the Commensal-Pathogen Continuum: A Systematic Review of Vaccines and Diagnostic Approaches.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Associations between subclinical bovine respiratory disease, growth patterns, and the nasal and fecal microbiota in dairy replacement heifers: a retrospective study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Cross-sectional study of calves from Norwegian fattening herds with enzootic pneumonia: pathogen occurrence, clinical relevance, antimicrobial resistance, and agreement between respiratory tract sampling sites.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Impact of whole-herd vaccination on a caprine coxiellosis outbreak: a longitudinal study ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Decoding the dynamics of calves' respiratory and gut microbiota: exploring stability, resistance, and individual patterns.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Nasal Microbial Communities of Beef Calves During Pre-Weaning Outbreak of Bovine Respiratory Disease.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Isolation, Pathogenicity and Genomic Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review: Bovine Respiratory Disease, Current Insights into Epidemiology, Diagnostic Challenges, and Vaccination.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
- Comparison of virulence and resistance genes inMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Development of a Novel, Non-Invasive Saliva Sampling Method for the Detection of Bovine Respiratory Viruses.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Genome-centric metagenomics reveals uncharacterised microbiomes in Angus cattle.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Nasal pathobiont abundance is a moderate feedlot-dependent indicator of bovine respiratory disease in beef cattle.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Virulence Is More than Adhesion and Invasion Ability, an In Vitro Cell Infection Assay of BovineMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Nasal pathobiont abundance does not differ between dairy cattle with or without clinical symptoms of bovine respiratory disease.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBovine respiratory disease (BRD) is an ongoing health and economic challenge in the dairy and beef cattle industries. Multiple risk factors make an animal susceptible to BRD. The presence of Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni, and Mycoplasma bovis in lung tissues have been associated with BRD mortalities, but they are also commonly present in the upper respiratory tract of healthy animals. This study aims to compare the cattle nasal microbiome (diversity, composition and community interaction) and the abundance of BRD pathogens (by qPCR) in the nasal microbiome of Holstein steers that are apparently healthy (Healthy group, n = 75) or with BRD clinical signs (BRD group, n = 58). We then used random forest models based on nasal microbial community and qPCR results to classify healthy and BRD-affected animals and determined the agreement with the visual clinical signs. Additionally, co-occurring species pairs were identified in visually BRD or healthy animal groups.
resultsCattle in the BRD group had lower alpha diversity than pen-mates in the healthy group. Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) from Trueperella pyogenes, Bibersteinia and Mycoplasma spp. were increased in relative abundance in the BRD group, while ASVs from Mycoplasma bovirhinis and Clostridium sensu stricto were increased in the healthy group. Prevalence of H. somni (98%) and P. multocida (97%) was high regardless of BRD clinical signs whereas M. haemolytica (81 and 61%, respectively) and M. bovis (74 and 51%, respectively) were more prevalent in the BRD group than the healthy group. In the BRD group, the abundance of M. haemolytica and M. bovis was increased, while H. somni abundance was decreased. Visual observation of clinical signs agreed with classification by the nasal microbial community (misclassification rate of 32%) and qPCR results (misclassification rate 34%). Co-occurrence analysis demonstrated that the nasal microbiome of BRD-affected cattle presented fewer bacterial associations than healthy cattle.
conclusionsThis study offers insight into the prevalence and abundance of BRD pathogens and the differences in the nasal microbiome between healthy and BRD animals. This suggests that nasal bacterial communities provide a potential platform for future studies and potential pen-side diagnostic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.