Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35193648›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sOlution versus an Electrolyte solutioN In patients undergoing eleCtive abdominal Surgery: study protocol for the PHOENICS study.

Wolfgang Buhre, Dianne de Korte-de Boer, Marcelo Gama de Abreu, Thomas Scheeren, Matthias Gruenewald, Andreas Hoeft, Donat R Spahn, Alexander Zarbock, Sylvia Daamen, Martin Westphal and 14 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03278548 (Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Multi-centre, Multinational Study on the Safety and Efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03278548 phase4completednot on this map

Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Multi-centre, Multinational Study on the Safety and Efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES) Solution Versus an Electrolyte Solution in Patients Undergoing Elective Abdominal Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorFresenius KabiRan2017 to 2022Enrolled2,289ConditionsHypovolaemia Due to Acute Blood LossArmsVolulyte 6%, Ionolyte
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effect of Selected Crystalloid and Colloid Solutions on Coagulation Status Evaluated by Rotational Thromboelastometry and Platelet Function Analyser: An in vitro Study.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 20 institutions in 13 countries.

Wolfgang BuhreDivision of Acute and Critical Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. wolfgang.buhre@mumc.nl.
Dianne de Korte-de BoerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marcelo Gama de AbreuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Thomas ScheerenDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Matthias GruenewaldDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Andreas HoeftDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Donat R SpahnInstitute of Anesthesiology, University and University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Alexander ZarbockDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Sylvia DaamenEuropean Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Brussels, Belgium.
Martin WestphalFresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany.
Ute BrauerDepartment of Medical Scientific Affairs, Hospital Care Division, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany.
Tamara DehnhardtDepartment of Medical Scientific Affairs, Hospital Care Division, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany.
Sonja SchmierDepartment of Medical Scientific Affairs, Hospital Care Division, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany.
Jean-Francois BaronFresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany.
Stefan De HertDepartment of Anesthesioloy and Perioperative Medicine, Gent University Hospital - Gent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Željka GavranovićDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia.
Bernard CholleyService d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
Tomas VymazalDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Medicine, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
Wojciech SzczeklikDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, 5th Military Clinical Hosptial, Krakow, Poland.
Helmar Bornemann-CimentiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Marina Blanca Soro DomingoDepartment of Surgery, Clinic University Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Ioana GrintescuClinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Radmilo JankovicClinic for Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University Clinical Center Nis, School of Medicine, University of Nis, Nis, Serbia.
Javier BeldaDepartment of Surgery, Clinic University Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
B. Braun (Germany) · DEFresenius (Germany) · DEMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL1 Military Clinical Hospital with Outpatient Clinic · PLClinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · ROEuropean Society of Anaesthesiology · BEGhent University Hospital · BEHôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou · FRHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESImation (United States) · USMedical University of Graz · ATSisters of Charity Hospital · HRTU Dresden · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity Hospital in Motol · CZUniversity Hospital Münster · DEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Lübeck · DEUniversity of Nis · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions are used for volume therapy to treat hypovolemia due to acute blood loss and to maintain hemodynamic stability. This study was requested by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to provide more evidence on the long-term safety and efficacy of HES solutions in the perioperative setting.

methodsPHOENICS is a randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational phase IV (IIIb) study with two parallel groups to investigate non-inferiority regarding the safety of a 6% HES 130 solution (Volulyte 6%, Fresenius Kabi, Germany) compared with a crystalloid solution (Ionolyte, Fresenius Kabi, Germany) for infusion in patients with acute blood loss during elective abdominal surgery. A total of 2280 eligible patients (male and female patients willing to participate, with expected blood loss ≥ 500 ml, aged > 40 and ≤ 85 years, and ASA Physical status II-III) are randomly assigned to receive either HES or crystalloid solution for the treatment of hypovolemia due to surgery-induced acute blood loss in hospitals in up to 11 European countries. The dosing of investigational products (IP) is individualized to patients' volume needs and guided by a volume algorithm. Patients are treated with IP for maximally 24 h or until the maximum daily dose of 30 ml/kg body weight is reached. The primary endpoint is the treatment group mean difference in the change from the pre-operative baseline value in cystatin-C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), to the eGFR value calculated from the highest cystatin-C level measured during post-operative days 1-3. Further safety and efficacy parameters include, e.g., combined mortality/major post-operative complications until day 90, renal function, coagulation, inflammation, hemodynamic variables, hospital length of stay, major post-operative complications, and 28-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality. DISCUSSION: The study will provide important information on the long-term safety and efficacy of HES 130/0.4 when administered according to the approved European product information. The results will be relevant for volume therapy of surgical patients.

trial registrationEudraCT 2016-002162-30 . ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03278548.

Indexed as

AbdomenHydroxyethyl Starch DerivativesAged, 80 and overDouble-Blind MethodElectrolytesEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPlasma SubstitutesProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicElectrolytesHydroxyethyl Starch DerivativesPlasma SubstitutesBlood lossColloidsDouble-blindedHESHydroxyethyl starchMulti-centerMultinationalNon-inferiority trialRandomized controlled trialSafetySurgeryVolume therapy

Identifiers

PMID35193648
PMCPMC8862305
OpenAlexW4213020121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.