Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35193640›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol.

Sang-Min Park, Kwang-Sup Song, Ho-Joong Kim, Si-Young Park, Taewook Kang, Min-Seok Kang, Dong Hwa Heo, Choon Keun Park, Dong-Geun Lee, Jin Sub Hwang and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Sang-Min Park *Spine Center and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Kwang-Sup Song *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ho-Joong KimSpine Center and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Si-Young ParkDepartment of Orthopaedics, Korea University College of Medicine, Anam Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Taewook KangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Korea University College of Medicine, Anam Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Min-Seok KangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Endoscopic Spine Surgery Center, Bumin Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Dong Hwa HeoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Endoscopic Spine Surgery Center, Seoul Bumin Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Choon Keun ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon, South Korea.
Dong-Geun LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon, South Korea.
Jin Sub HwangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon, South Korea.
Jae-Won JangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon, South Korea.
Jun Young KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon, South Korea.
Jin-Sung KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Hong-Jae LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Ki-Han YouDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Center, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 1, Singil-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07441, South Korea.
Hyun-Jin ParkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Center, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 1, Singil-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07441, South Korea. phjfrog@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8075-2813
Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital · KRKorea University Medical Center · KRBumin Hospital Group · KRHallym University · KRChung-Ang University · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital · KR

Funding

Korea National Institute of Health HC20C0163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiportal endoscopic surgery has recently been performed in lumbar discectomy, with advantages over conventional surgery, such as less skin scarring and muscle damage. However, the clinical results have not been established. Although previous studies reported no difference between the biportal endoscopic and microscopic discectomy clinical results, the evidence was weak. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the biportal endoscopic discectomy versus the microscopic discectomy.

methodsThis prospective multicenter randomized controlled equivalence trial is designed to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of patients who underwent lumbar discectomy using biportal endoscopy or microscopy. We will include 100 participants (50 per group) with a lumbar herniated disc. The primary outcome will be the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score 12 months after surgery based on a modified intention-to-treat strategy. The secondary outcomes will include the visual analog scale score for low back and lower extremity radiating pain, the ODI score, the Euro-Qol-5-Dimensions score, surgery satisfaction, walking time, postoperative return to daily life period, postoperative surgical scar, and surgery-related variables, such as postoperative drainage, operation time, admission duration, postoperative creatine kinase, and implementation status of conversion to open surgery. Radiographic outcomes will also be analyzed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) and simple radiographs. Safety will be assessed by evaluating all adverse and severe adverse events and surgery-related effects. The participants will be assessed by a blinded assessor before surgery (baseline) and 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. DISCUSSION: This trial will be the first prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to analyze the efficacy and safety of biportal endoscopic discectomy in lumbar herniated disc. This trial is designed for evaluating the equivalence of the results between biportal endoscopic and microscopic discectomy including adequate sample size, blinded analyses, and prospective registration to reduce bias. This trial will provide enough data on the effectiveness and safety of biportal endoscopic surgery and will be an important study that allows clear conclusions.

trial registrationClinical Research Information Service (cris.nih.go.kr.) ( KCT0006191 ). Registered on 27 March 2021.

Indexed as

Intervertebral DiscIntervertebral Disc DisplacementDiskectomyEndoscopyHumansLumbar VertebraeMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBiportal endoscopic lumbar discectomyLumbar disc herniationMicroscopic lumbar discectomyRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID35193640
PMCPMC8864786
OpenAlexW4212995860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.