Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35193630›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2022

Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to dominant intra-prostatic lesions during extreme hypofractionation for prostate cancer: the impact of rectal spacers.

Sarah O S Osman, Ciaran Fairmichael, Glenn Whitten, Gavin S Lundy, Rachel Wesselman, Melissa LaBonte Wilson, Alan R Hounsell, Kevin M Prise, Denise Irvine, Conor K McGarry and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah O S OsmanPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK. osman.sarah@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6103-5870
Ciaran FairmichaelPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK.
Glenn WhittenRadiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Gavin S LundyPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK.
Rachel WesselmanRadiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Melissa LaBonte WilsonPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK.
Alan R HounsellPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK.
Kevin M PrisePatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK.
Denise IrvineRadiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Conor K McGarryPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK.
Suneil JainPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK.
Queen's University Belfast · GBBelfast Health and Social Care Trust · GB

Funding

Prostate Cancer UK MA-CE018-002r&d division of the public health agency COM/4965/14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBoosting dominant intra-prostatic lesions (DILs) has the potential to increase the therapeutic ratio in prostate cancer radiotherapy. In this study, employing 5-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to deliver 40 Gy to the prostate clinical target volume (CTV) while boosting the DIL up to 50 Gy was evaluated for patients before and after rectal spacer insertion. MATERIALS AND

methods24 Computed Tomography (CT) scans of 12 prostate cancer patients with unfavourable intermediate or high risk prostate cancer were employed in this study. At least two treatment plans were generated for each patient to compare pre- and post-spacer insertion plans. Plans were evaluated for target coverage, organs-at-risk doses, and the achievable boost dose level.

resultsThe CTV coverage was significantly better in plans with a spacer, V

conclusionsClinically acceptable plans for 5 fraction SABR, 40 Gy to the prostate CTV, with a SIB to DIL (45-50 Gy) were achieved. The boost dose achieved was DIL location dependent and primarily affected by DIL's proximity to the urethra. Compared to plans before spacer insertion, higher DIL dose were achieved with spacer in situ for 25% of the patients. Moreover, significant reduction in rectal dose and better target coverage were also achieved for all patients with spacers in situ.

Indexed as

Radiation Dose HypofractionationAdenocarcinomaHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRectumDominant intra-prostatic lesions (DIL)Dose limiting organsProstate cancerRectal spacers

Identifiers

PMID35193630
PMCPMC8862253
OpenAlexW4212956929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.