Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35193609›Full record

Trial reportNutrition journal2022

Safety and efficacy of a probiotic-containing infant formula supplemented with 2'-fucosyllactose: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Philippe Alliet, Yvan Vandenplas, Paola Roggero, Sabine N J Jespers, Stefaan Peeters, Jean-Philippe Stalens, Guus A M Kortman, Mailis Amico, Bernard Berger, Norbert Sprenger and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrition journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03090360 (Growth of Infants Fed a New Term Infant Formula With a Prebiotic), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03090360 nacompletednot on this map

Growth of Infants Fed a New Term Infant Formula With a Prebiotic

TypeinterventionalSponsorSociété des Produits Nestlé (SPN)Ran2017 to 2019Enrolled349ConditionsHealthyArmsInfant formula (CF), Infant Formula (EF)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. A Scoping Review of Instruments Used to Measure Weight and Body Composition in Infants Under 1 Year.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Philippe AllietDepartment of Pediatrics, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Yvan VandenplasKidZ Health Castle, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Paola RoggeroDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Sabine N J JespersClinique Et Maternité Sainte-Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium.
Stefaan PeetersAlgemeen Stedelijk Ziekenhuis Aalst, Aalst, Belgium.
Jean-Philippe StalensDepartment of Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier de Wallonie Picarde, Tournai, Belgium.
Guus A M KortmanNIZO Food Research BV, Ede, The Netherlands.
Mailis AmicoBiostatistics & Data, Nestlé Research, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bernard BergerNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Nestlé Research, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland.
Norbert SprengerNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Nestlé Research, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland.
Colin I CercamondiNestlé Product Technology Center - Nutrition, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Vevey, Switzerland. colinivano.cercamondi@nestle.com.
Giovanni CorselloDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences Maternal and Infant Care, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) have important and diverse biological functions in early life. This study tested the safety and efficacy of a starter infant formula containing Limosilactobacillus (L.) reuteri DSM 17938 and supplemented with 2'-fucosyllactose (2'FL).

methodsHealthy infants < 14 days old (n = 289) were randomly assigned to a bovine milk-based formula containing L. reuteri DSM 17938 at 1 × 10

resultsWeight gain in EG was non-inferior to CG as shown by a mean difference [95% CI] of 0.26 [-1.26, 1.79] g/day with the lower bound of the 95% CI above the non-inferiority margin (-3 g/day). Anthropometric Z-scores, parent-reported stooling characteristics, gastrointestinal symptoms and associated behaviors, and AEs were comparable between formula groups. Redundancy analysis indicated that the microbiota composition in EG was different from CG at age 2 (p = 0.050) and 3 months (p = 0.052), approaching BF. Similarly, between sample phylogenetic distance (weighted UniFrac) for BF vs EG was smaller than for BF vs CG at 3-month age (p = 0.045). At age 1 month, Clostridioides difficile counts were significantly lower in EG than CG. Bifidobacterium relative abundance in EG tracked towards that in BF. Fecal biomarkers and metabolic profile were comparable between CG and EG.

conclusionL. reuteri-containing infant formula with 2'FL supports age-appropriate growth, is well-tolerated and may play a role in shifting the gut microbial pattern towards that of breastfed infants.

trial registrationThe trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03090360 ) on 24/03/2017.

Indexed as

Infant FormulaProbioticsDouble-Blind MethodFecesHumansInfantMilk, HumanOligosaccharidesPhylogenyTrisaccharides2'-fucosyllactoseOligosaccharidesTrisaccharides2’fucosyllactoseGrowthGut microbiomeHuman milk oligosaccharidesInfant formula

Identifiers

PMID35193609
PMCPMC8862345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.