Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35193533›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

Deep learning identifies Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia in bone marrow smears.

Jan-Niklas Eckardt, Tim Schmittmann, Sebastian Riechert, Michael Kramer, Anas Shekh Sulaiman, Katja Sockel, Frank Kroschinsky, Johannes Schetelig, Lisa Wagenführ, Ulrich Schuler and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cross-modal fusion of cytomorphology andFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jan-Niklas EckardtDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany. jan-niklas.eckardt@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
Tim SchmittmannInstitute of Software and Multimedia Technology, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Sebastian RiechertInstitute of Software and Multimedia Technology, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Michael KramerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Anas Shekh SulaimanDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Katja SockelDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Frank KroschinskyDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Johannes ScheteligDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Lisa WagenführDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Ulrich SchulerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Uwe PlatzbeckerDepartment of Medicine I, Hematology, Cellular Therapy, Hemostaseology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Christian ThiedeDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Friedrich StölzelDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Christoph RölligDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Martin BornhäuserDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Karsten Wendt *Institute of Software and Multimedia Technology, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jan Moritz Middeke *Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DETU Dresden · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DELeipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is considered a hematologic emergency due to high risk of bleeding and fatal hemorrhages being a major cause of death. Despite lower death rates reported from clinical trials, patient registry data suggest an early death rate of 20%, especially for elderly and frail patients. Therefore, reliable diagnosis is required as treatment with differentiation-inducing agents leads to cure in the majority of patients. However, diagnosis commonly relies on cytomorphology and genetic confirmation of the pathognomonic t(15;17). Yet, the latter is more time consuming and in some regions unavailable.

methodsIn recent years, deep learning (DL) has been evaluated for medical image recognition showing outstanding capabilities in analyzing large amounts of image data and provides reliable classification results. We developed a multi-stage DL platform that automatically reads images of bone marrow smears, accurately segments cells, and subsequently predicts APL using image data only. We retrospectively identified 51 APL patients from previous multicenter trials and compared them to 1048 non-APL acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and 236 healthy bone marrow donor samples, respectively.

resultsOur DL platform segments bone marrow cells with a mean average precision and a mean average recall of both 0.97. Further, it achieves high accuracy in detecting APL by distinguishing between APL and non-APL AML as well as APL and healthy donors with an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.8575 and 0.9585, respectively, using visual image data only.

conclusionsOur study underlines not only the feasibility of DL to detect distinct morphologies that accompany a cytogenetic aberration like t(15;17) in APL, but also shows the capability of DL to abstract information from a small medical data set, i. e. 51 APL patients, and infer correct predictions. This demonstrates the suitability of DL to assist in the diagnosis of rare cancer entities. As our DL platform predicts APL from bone marrow smear images alone, this may be used to diagnose APL in regions were molecular or cytogenetic subtyping is not routinely available and raise attention to suspected cases of APL for expert evaluation.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAgedBone Marrow CellsBone Marrow ExaminationFemaleHumansLeukemia, Promyelocytic, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesStaining and LabelingAcute myeloid leukemiaAcute promyelocytic leukemiaArtificial intelligenceBone marrow smearDeep learning

Identifiers

PMID35193533
PMCPMC8864866
OpenAlexW4212909533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.