Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35193509›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

Patients' preferences for telemedicine versus in-clinic consultation in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

I Mozes, D Mossinson, H Schilder, D Dvir, O Baron-Epel, A Heymann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Understanding patient priorities in teledermatology for psoriasis: A discrete choice experiment.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Factors affecting the acceptance of tele-psychiatry: a scoping study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Changes in general practice use and costs with COVID-19 and telehealth initiatives: analysis of Australian whole-population linked data.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

I MozesSchool of Public Health, Haifa University, 199 Aba Khoushy Ave. Mount Carmel, 3498838, Haifa, Israel. inbal.mos@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2304-3022
D MossinsonMeuhedet Health Services, 124 Ibn Gabirol, 6203854, Tel Aviv, Israel.
H SchilderMeuhedet Health Services, 124 Ibn Gabirol, 6203854, Tel Aviv, Israel.
D DvirMeuhedet Health Services, 124 Ibn Gabirol, 6203854, Tel Aviv, Israel.
O Baron-EpelSchool of Public Health, Haifa University, 199 Aba Khoushy Ave. Mount Carmel, 3498838, Haifa, Israel.
A HeymannMedical School, Tel Aviv University, 69978, Ramat Aviv, Israel.
University of Haifa · ILTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Hybrid Patient Care system integrates telehealth and in-clinic consultation. While COVID-19 increased telehealth use, healthcare providers are still seeking the best combination of virtual and in-clinic consultation. Understanding patients' tele-consultation-related preferences is vital for achieving optimal implementation. The discrete choice experiment (DCE) is the stated preference technique for eliciting individual preferences and is increasingly being used in health-related applications. The study purpose was to evaluate attributes and levels of the DCE regarding patients' preferences for telemedicine versus traditional, in-clinic consultation in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic, in order to facilitate successful implementation.

methodsA three-phase structure was used in the qualitative stage of the DCE: (1) a literature review and preparation of interview guides; (2) Eight focus group interviews comprised of 26 patients and 33 physicians; and (3) Attribute selection: a ranking exercise among 48 patients. The Think Aloud technique, in which respondents are asked to verbalize their thoughts, was used in the focus groups. Interview data were analyzed by thematic analysis.

resultsEight attributes were proposed by the patients in the focus groups. The four most important attributes were then selected in pre-testing, and are described in this study: Availability, time until the appointment, severity of the medical problem, patient-physician relationship, and flexible reception hours.

conclusionsThis study has a theoretical contribution in post-COVID-19 patients' preferences in Hybrid Medicine patient care. This provides a foundation to assess the rigors of this stage and provide additional evidence to the limited existing literature on attributes development for DCE patient preferences.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineChoice BehaviorHumansPandemicsPatient PreferencePrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationSARS-CoV-2Covid-19Discrete choice experimentHybrid primary carePatients’ preferencesTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35193509
PMCPMC8862698
OpenAlexW4212894323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.