ArticlePhysical review. E2022
Characterizing stochastic cell-cycle dynamics in exponential growth.
Article in Physical review. E, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The design of unit cells by combining the self-reproduction systems and metabolic cushioning loads.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Noise robustness and metabolic load determine the principles of central dogma regulation.Science advances · 2024Article
- Noise robustness and metabolic load determine the principles of central dogma regulation.ArXiv · 2024Article
- Noise robustness and metabolic load determine the principles of central dogma regulation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Genome replication in asynchronously growing microbial populations.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- The human cell count and size distribution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- The in vivo measurement of replication fork velocity and pausing by lag-time analysis.Nature communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Two powerful and complementary experimental approaches are commonly used to study the cell cycle and cell biology: One class of experiments characterizes the statistics (or demographics) of an unsynchronized exponentially growing population, while the other captures cell-cycle dynamics, either by time-lapse imaging of full cell cycles or in bulk experiments on synchronized populations. In this paper, we study the subtle relationship between observations in these two distinct experimental approaches. We begin with an existing model: A single-cell deterministic description of cell-cycle dynamics where cell states (i.e., periods or phases) have precise lifetimes. We then generalize this description to a stochastic model in which the states have stochastic lifetimes, as described by arbitrary probability distribution functions. Our analyses of the demographics of an exponential culture reveal a simple and exact correspondence between the deterministic and stochastic models: The corresponding state ages in the deterministic model are equal to the exponential mean of the age in the stochastic model. An important implication is therefore that the demographics of an exponential culture will be well fit by a deterministic model even if the state timing is stochastic. Although we explore the implications of the models in the context of the Escherichia coli cell cycle, we expect both the models as well as the significance of the exponential-mean lifetimes to find many applications in the quantitative analysis of cell-cycle dynamics in other biological systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.