Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35192827›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2022

Can spike fragments of SARS-CoV-2 induce genomic instability and DNA damage in the guppy, Poecilia reticulate? An unexpected effect of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sandy de Oliveira Gonçalves, Thiarlen Marinho da Luz, Abner Marcelino Silva, Sindoval Silva de Souza, Mateus Flores Montalvão, Abraão Tiago Batista Guimarães, Mohamed Ahmed Ibrahim Ahmed, Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Sengodan Karthi, Guilherme Malafaia

RetractedOpen access · greenAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Sandy de Oliveira GonçalvesLaboratório de Pesquisas Biológicas, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano - Campus Urutaí, GO, Brazil.
Thiarlen Marinho da LuzLaboratório de Pesquisas Biológicas, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano - Campus Urutaí, GO, Brazil.
Abner Marcelino SilvaLaboratório de Pesquisas Biológicas, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano - Campus Urutaí, GO, Brazil.
Sindoval Silva de SouzaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Conservação de Recursos Naturais do Cerrado, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano - Campus Urutaí, GO, Brazil.
Mateus Flores MontalvãoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação de Recursos Naturais, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
Abraão Tiago Batista GuimarãesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia e Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal de Goiás, GO, Brazil.
Mohamed Ahmed Ibrahim AhmedPlant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Assiut University, Assiut, 71526, Egypt.
Amanda Pereira da Costa AraújoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Federal de Goiás, GO, Brazil.
Sengodan KarthiDivision of Biopesticides and Environmental Toxicology, Sri Paramakalyani Centre for Excellence in Environmental Sciences, Monomania Sundaranar University, Alwarkurichi 627 412, India.
Guilherme MalafaiaLaboratório de Pesquisas Biológicas, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano - Campus Urutaí, GO, Brazil; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Conservação de Recursos Naturais do Cerrado, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano - Campus Urutaí, GO, Brazil; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação de Recursos Naturais, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, MG, Brazil; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia e Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal de Goiás, GO, Brazil. Electronic address: guilhermeifgoiano@gmail.com.
Instituto Federal Goiano · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BRAssiut University · EGManonmaniam Sundaranar University · INUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of SARS-CoV-2 particles in wastewater and freshwater ecosystems has raised concerns about its possible impacts on non-target aquatic organisms. In this particular, our knowledge of such impacts is still limited, and little attention has been given to this issue. Hence, in our study, we aimed to evaluate the possible induction of mutagenic (via micronucleus test) and genotoxic (via single cell gel electrophoresis assay, comet assay) effects in Poecilia reticulata adults exposed to fragments of the Spike protein of the new coronavirus at the level of 40 μg/L, denominated PSPD-2002. As a result, after 10 days of exposure, we have found that animals exposed to the peptides demonstrated an increase in the frequency of erythrocytic nuclear alteration (ENA) and all parameters assessed in the comet assay (length tail, %DNA in tail and Olive tail moment), suggesting that PSPD-2002 peptides were able to cause genomic instability and erythrocyte DNA damage. Besides, these effects were significantly correlated with the increase in lipid peroxidation processes [inferred by the high levels of malondialdehyde (MDA)] reported in the brain and liver of P. reticulata and with the reduction of the superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activity. Thus, our study constitutes a new insight and promising investigation into the toxicity associated with the dispersal of SARS-CoV-2 peptide fragments in freshwater environments.

Indexed as

COVID-19PoeciliaWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsComet AssayDNA DamageEcosystemGenomic InstabilityHumansPandemicsPeptidesSARS-CoV-2PeptidesWater Pollutants, ChemicalCOVID-19Freshwater fishGenotoxicityMutagenicityViral particlesWater pollution

Identifiers

PMID35192827
PMCPMC8857768
OpenAlexW4212795066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.