Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35192655›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

Acceptability of an extended duration vaginal ring for HIV prevention and interest in a multi-purpose ring.

Marie C D Stoner, Erica N Browne, Holly M Gundacker, Imogen Hawley, Beatrice A Chen, Craig Hoesley, Rachel Scheckter, Jeanna Piper, Devika Singh, Mei Song and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06163274 (MATRIX-003), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06163274 early_phase1terminatednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

MATRIX-003: Trial to Assess Acceptability and Safety of Two Placebo Intravaginal Ring Designs

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2024 to 2025Enrolled93ConditionsSafety, AcceptabilityArmsPlacebo Intravaginal Ring A, Placebo Intravaginal Ring B
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Marie C D StonerWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7189-8669
Erica N BrowneWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.
Holly M GundackerStatistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research & Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Imogen HawleyWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.
Beatrice A ChenMagee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Craig HoesleyUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
Rachel ScheckterFHI 360, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Jeanna PiperUS National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Devika SinghMagee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Mei SongMagee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Albert LiuBridge HIV, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Ariane van der StratenWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.
RTI International · USMagee-Womens Research Institute · USFamily Health International 360 · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068633 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HILLIER, SHARON L. · 2011 to 2021
$175.0M
Statistical and Data Management Center (SDMC): Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068615 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BROWN, ELIZABETH RENATA · 2011 to 2021
$66.5M
Ujima Mentoring ProgramP30MH062246 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Sheri Ann Lippman · 2001 to 2026
$57.4M
WG3: HIV, Co-infections and Co-morbiditiesP30AI036219 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Sharon L. Hillier, JONATHAN KARN · 1994 to 2026
$50.0M
University of Pittsburgh Clinical Trials UnitUM1AI069494 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SUSAN L KOLETAR, John W Mellors · 2012 to 2026
$38.0M
San Francisco Vaccine and Prevention UnitUM1AI069496 · NIAID · PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES · PI Susan Buchbinder, Diane V Havlir · 2012 to 2026
$30.5M
Laboratory Center (LC): Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI106707 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI MELLORS, JOHN W, ROHAN, LISA CENCIA · 2014 to 2021
$27.1M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI036219NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068615NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068633NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069494NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069496NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI106707NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062246PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given challenges with adherence to existing HIV prevention products, the development of an extended duration vaginal ring could improve adherence while reducing patient and provider burden. Additionally, women have other interlinked sexual health concerns such as unintended pregnancy. We evaluated acceptability of a 90-day ring to prevent HIV and hypothetical preferences for a dual (HIV and contraceptive) indication. This was a secondary analysis of a Phase 1, two-arm, multi-site, placebo-controlled randomized trial evaluating safety and pharmacokinetics of a 90-day vaginal ring containing tenofovir for HIV prevention (N = 49). We used a mixed methods approach to assess quantitative data on acceptability (n = 49) and used qualitative data from a random subset to explain the quantitative findings (N = 25). The 3-month extended duration tenofovir ring was highly acceptable. Participants perceived the ring to be easy to use, comfortable and reported liking it more over time. About half felt the ring during sex but most of those participants said it bothered them only a little. Concerns about hygiene increased over the study period but were often outweighed by the benefits of an extended duration ring. Interest in a multi-purpose ring was high (77%) and even higher among those who were sexually active and had male partners. The 3-month extended duration tenofovir ring for HIV prevention was highly acceptable among women and interest in an MPT was high.

Indexed as

Contraceptive Devices, FemaleAdministration, IntravaginalAdultAnti-HIV AgentsCoitusFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePre-Exposure ProphylaxisPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedTenofovirAnti-HIV AgentsTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID35192655
PMCPMC8863232
OpenAlexW4212864271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.