Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35192444›Full record

SynthesisThe journal of spinal cord medicine2023

A systematic review of suicidal ideation and behaviors among adults with spinal cord injury.

Lisa M Betthauser, Adam S Hoffberg, Kelly A Stearns-Yoder, Matthew Harmon, David Coons, Lisa A Brenner

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa M BetthauserVA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (RM MIRECC), Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center (RMR VAMC), Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Adam S HoffbergVA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (RM MIRECC), Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center (RMR VAMC), Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Kelly A Stearns-YoderVA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (RM MIRECC), Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center (RMR VAMC), Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Matthew HarmonDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (PM&R), University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
David CoonsDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (PM&R), University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Lisa A BrennerVA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (RM MIRECC), Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center (RMR VAMC), Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System · USMental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Centers · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextSuicide is a public health crisis within the United States. Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) are vulnerable to negative outcomes such as suicide.

objectiveThis systematic review describes frequency of suicidal ideation (SI) and behaviors (suicide attempt [SA] and deaths) among samples of adults living with SCI. Associated risk and protective factors of SI and suicidal behaviors were also explored.

methodsOn July 7, 2021, OVID Medline, EMBASE, OVID PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched for SI, SA, and deaths by suicide among adults with a history of SCI. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool. Results were synthesized descriptively considering the likely impact of RoB. The updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 reporting method was used.

resultsSixty-nine articles were included. Frequency of SI and SAs within study samples ranged from 4% to 67%, and 0% to approximately 66%, respectively. While assessment methods for SI and SA widely varied, suicide deaths data sources were more consistent. Studies assessing SI and SA generally had high RoB and the overall strength of evidence was low. Stronger observational study designs assessing death by suicide had low RoB and the overall strength of evidence was high. Very few studies examined protective factors. DISCUSSION: Findings support previous work. Quality of evidence, and therefore confidence in the frequency of these outcomes, was impacted by the use of assessment measures without sufficient psychometric properties. The field will benefit from use of psychometrically sound measures to assess for SI, SA and suicide deaths. Furthermore, additional work is needed to elucidate risk and protective factors and to clearly characterize samples to increase generalizability of findings to the larger SCI community, including standardized reporting of SCI characteristics (e.g. use of American Spinal Injury Association classification system). Ultimately, improved suicide assessment and risk management is expected to prevent suicide among those living with SCI. REGISTRATION: CRD42020164686.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesSuicidal IdeationAdultDatabases, FactualHumansObservational Studies as TopicRisk FactorsSuicide, AttemptedAdultsSpinal cord injurySuicidal ideationSuicideSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35192444
PMCPMC10274522
OpenAlexW4213450240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.