Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35192243›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022

Three-dimensional deep neural network for automatic delineation of cervical cancer in planning computed tomography images.

Yi Ding, Zhiran Chen, Ziqi Wang, Xiaohong Wang, Desheng Hu, Pingping Ma, Chi Ma, Wei Wei, Xiangbin Li, Xudong Xue and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Automatic pelvic bone segmentation for radiotherapy using diagnostic imaging workstation.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Article
  5. Cervical cancer segmentation based on medical images: a literature review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yi DingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, TongJi Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Zhiran ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, TongJi Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Ziqi WangKey Laboratory of Artificial Micro and Nano-structures of Ministry of Education, Center for Theoretical Physics, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Xiaohong WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, TongJi Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Desheng HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, TongJi Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Pingping MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, TongJi Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Chi MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers-Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Wei WeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, TongJi Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiangbin LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, TongJi Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xudong XueDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, TongJi Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiao WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers-Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Hubei Cancer Hospital · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNRutgers Cancer Institute of New JerseyWuhan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 12075095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRadiation therapy is an essential treatment modality for cervical cancer, while accurate and efficient segmentation methods are needed to improve the workflow. In this study, a three-dimensional V-net model is proposed to automatically segment clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs), and to provide prospective guidance for low lose area. MATERIAL AND

methodsA total of 130 CT datasets were included. Ninety cases were randomly selected as the training data, with 10 cases used as the validation data, and the remaining 30 cases as testing data. The V-net model was implemented with Tensorflow package to segment the CTV and OARs, as well as regions of 5 Gy, 10 Gy, 15 Gy, and 20 Gy isodose lines covered. The auto-segmentation by V-net was compared to auto-segmentation by U-net. Four representative parameters were calculated to evaluate the accuracy of the delineation, including Dice similarity coefficients (DSC), Jaccard index (JI), average surface distance (ASD), and Hausdorff distance (HD).

resultsThe V-net and U-net achieved the average DSC value for CTV of 0.85 and 0.83, average JI values of 0.77 and 0.75, average ASD values of 2.58 and 2.26, average HD of 11.2 and 10.08, respectively. As for the OARs, the performance of the V-net model in the colon was significantly better than the U-net model (p = 0.046), and the performance in the kidney, bladder, femoral head, and pelvic bones were comparable to the U-net model. For prediction of low-dose areas, the average DSC of the patients' 5 Gy dose area in the test set were 0.88 and 0.83, for V-net and U-net, respectively.

conclusionsIt is feasible to use the V-Net model to automatically segment cervical cancer CTV and OARs to achieve a more efficient radiotherapy workflow. In the delineation of most target areas and OARs, the performance of V-net is better than U-net. It also offers advantages with its feature of predicting the low-dose area prospectively before radiation therapy (RT).

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerOrgans at RiskProspective StudiesRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray Computedautomatic delineationcervical cancerCTVdeep learning model

Identifiers

PMID35192243
PMCPMC8992957
OpenAlexW4213079828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.