Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35192224›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2022

Drivers and forecasts of multiple waves of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A systematic analysis based on an interpretable machine learning framework.

Zicheng Cao, Zekai Qiu, Feng Tang, Shiwen Liang, Yinghan Wang, Haoyu Long, Cai Chen, Bing Zhang, Chi Zhang, Yaqi Wang and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Zicheng CaoSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Zekai QiuSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Feng TangSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Shiwen LiangSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Yinghan WangSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Haoyu LongSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Cai ChenSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Bing ZhangSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Chi ZhangSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Yaqi WangSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Kang TangSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Jing TangSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Junhong ChenSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Chunhui YangSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Yuzhe XuSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Yulin YangSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Shenglan XiaoSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Dechao TianSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Guozhi JiangSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Xiangjun DuSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8184-8430

Funding

Guangdong Frontier and Key Tech Innovation Program 2019B020228001Guangdong Frontier and Key Tech Innovation Program 2019B111103001Guangdong Frontier and Key Tech Innovation Program 212020012620600006National Key Research and Development Projects of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China 2021YFC2301300Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China 2021A1515011592Shenzhen Science and Technology Program KQTD20180411143323605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a global pandemic and continues to prevail with multiple rebound waves in many countries. The driving factors for the spread of COVID-19 and their quantitative contributions, especially to rebound waves, are not well studied. Multidimensional time-series data, including policy, travel, medical, socioeconomic, environmental, mutant and vaccine-related data, were collected from 39 countries up to 30 June 2021, and an interpretable machine learning framework (XGBoost model with Shapley Additive explanation interpretation) was used to systematically analyze the effect of multiple factors on the spread of COVID-19, using the daily effective reproduction number as an indicator. Based on a model of the pre-vaccine era, policy-related factors were shown to be the main drivers of the spread of COVID-19, with a contribution of 60.81%. In the post-vaccine era, the contribution of policy-related factors decreased to 28.34%, accompanied by an increase in the contribution of travel-related factors, such as domestic flights, and contributions emerged for mutant-related (16.49%) and vaccine-related (7.06%) factors. For single-peak countries, the dominant ones were policy-related factors during both the rising and fading stages, with overall contributions of 33.7% and 37.7%, respectively. For double-peak countries, factors from the rebound stage contributed 45.8% and policy-related factors showed the greatest contribution in both the rebound (32.6%) and fading (25.0%) stages. For multiple-peak countries, the Delta variant, domestic flights (current month) and the daily vaccination population are the three greatest contributors (8.12%, 7.59% and 7.26%, respectively). Forecasting models to predict the rebound risk were built based on these findings, with accuracies of 0.78 and 0.81 for the pre- and post-vaccine eras, respectively. These findings quantitatively demonstrate the systematic drivers of the spread of COVID-19, and the framework proposed in this study will facilitate the targeted prevention and control of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAnimalsMachine LearningSARS-CoV-2TravelTravel-Related IllnessCOVID-19forecastingmachine learningreboundspread

Identifiers

PMID35192224
PMCPMC9648501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.