ArticleMedical physics2022
Adaptive carbon ion radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Organ-sparing potential and target coverage.
Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic control of carbon-ion radiation dose distribution amid respiratory motion challenges: A review of prediction research using geant4 and deep learning physics-constrained models.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Review
- Daily image-guided carbon ion stereotactic radiotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma: paving the way for MR-guided online adaptive treatment.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Target Coverage Improvement With Dose Matching in Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer.International journal of particle therapy · 2025Article
- Cumulative Dose Analysis in Adaptive Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Article
- Article
- Adaptive carbon ion radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Organ-sparing potential and target coverage.Medical physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe dose distribution of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LANSCLC) is highly sensitive to anatomical changes. PURPOSE: To demonstrate the dosimetric benefits of adaptive CIRT for LANSCLC and compare the differences between patients with and without adaptive plans based on dosimetry and clinical effect factors. MATERIALS AND
methodsOf the 98 patients with LANSCLC receiving CIRT, 31 patients underwent replanning following re-evaluations that revealed changes that would have compromised the dose coverage of the target volume or violated dose constraints. Dosimetric parameters and clinical factors were compared between patients with and without adaptive plans. Multivariate analysis identified factors influencing the adaptive planning.
resultsThe median number of fractions delivered using adaptive plans was eight (range: 2-18). Adaptive plans ensured target coverage, and the maximum spinal cord dose was significantly decreased (p = 0.02). The median reduction in the maximum spinal cord dose was 10.4 Gy (relative biological effectiveness). Patients with adaptive plans had larger tumor volumes (p < 0.001); the median initial internal gross tumor volumes (iGTVs) of patients with adaptive and nonadaptive plans were 125.9 and 49.79 cm
conclusionsAn adaptive plan can effectively ensure target area coverage and protect normal tissues, especially in patients with large tumor volumes and substantial changes. iGTV volume changes and iGTV center movements are the main factors influencing adaptive planning. Weekly simulation computed tomography scans are necessary for treatment evaluation in patients with LANSCLC treated with CIRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.