Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35192185›Full record

ReviewImmunologic research2022

Immunogenic and reactogenic efficacy of Covaxin and Covishield: a comparative review.

Swarnali Das, Suvrendu Sankar Kar, Sovan Samanta, Jhimli Banerjee, Biplab Giri, Sandeep Kumar Dash

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunologic research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Swarnali DasDepartment of Physiology, University of Gour Banga, Malda, 732103, West Bengal, India.
Suvrendu Sankar KarDepartment of Medicine, R.G.Kar Medical College, Kolkata, 700004, West Bengal, India.
Sovan SamantaDepartment of Physiology, University of Gour Banga, Malda, 732103, West Bengal, India.
Jhimli BanerjeeDepartment of Physiology, University of Gour Banga, Malda, 732103, West Bengal, India.
Biplab GiriDepartment of Physiology, University of Gour Banga, Malda, 732103, West Bengal, India.
Sandeep Kumar DashDepartment of Physiology, University of Gour Banga, Malda, 732103, West Bengal, India. deep.vu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5435-8556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 is an RNA virus that was identified for the first time in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. The World Health Organization (WHO) labeled the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak a worldwide pandemic on March 11, 2020, due to its widespread infectivity pattern. Because of the catastrophic COVID-19 outbreak, the development of safe and efficient vaccinations has become a key priority in every health sector throughout the globe. On the 13th of January 2021, the vaccination campaign against SARS-CoV-2 was launched in India and started the administration of two types of vaccines known as Covaxin and Covishield. Covishield is an adenovirus vector-based vaccine, and Covaxin was developed by a traditional method of vaccine formulation, which is composed of adjuvanted inactivated viral particles. Each vaccine's utility or efficiency is determined by its formulation, adjuvants, and mode of action. The efficacy of the vaccination depends on numeral properties like generation antibodies, memory cells, and cell-mediated immunity. According to the third-phase experiment, Covishield showed effectiveness of nearly 90%, whereas Covaxin has an effectiveness of about 80%. Both vaccination formulations in India have so far demonstrated satisfactory efficacy against numerous mutant variants of SARS-CoV-2. The efficacy of Covishield may be diminished if the structure of spike (S) protein changes dramatically in the future. In this situation, Covaxin might be still effective for such variants owing to its ability to produce multiple antibodies against various epitopes. This study reviews the comparative immunogenic and therapeutic efficacy of Covaxin and Covishield and also discussed the probable vaccination challenges in upcoming days.

Indexed as

COVID-19Viral VaccinesAntibodies, ViralChAdOx1 nCoV-19HumansSARS-CoV-2VaccinationAntibodies, ViralChAdOx1 nCoV-19Viral VaccinesCovaxinCOVID-19CovishieldImmune responseVaccine

Identifiers

PMID35192185
PMCPMC8861611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.