ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2022
Cardiotoxicity of Systemic Melanoma Treatments.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- MicroRNAs and Alarmins in Cardio-Oncology: Biomarkers and Therapeutic Implications in Skin and Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Lipidomics in Melanoma: Insights into Disease Progression and Therapeutical Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Prevention of cancer-therapy related cardiac dysfunction.Current heart failure reports · 2025Review
- Drug Repurposing and Nanotechnology for Topical Skin Cancer Treatment: Redirecting toward Targeted and Synergistic Antitumor Effects.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Review
- Healthcare costs of cutaneous melanoma according to comorbidity patterns: a population-based study from the Regional Cancer Registry of the Veneto Region.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Skin Cancer Metabolic Profile Assessed by Different Analytical Platforms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Death in Older Malignant Melanoma Patients: A Population-Based Study.Cancers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementMelanoma is the least common but most dangerous skin cancer, accounting for 75% of all deaths from a primary cutaneous malignancy, with incidence rates rising significantly over the last decade. Traditional treatments for melanoma including interferon and cytotoxic chemotherapy had marginal efficacy. With the advent of targeted and immunotherapies, the prognosis for patients with advanced melanoma has significantly improved including those with metastatic disease to the heart. BRAF and MEK inhibitors as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors have become front line therapy for eligible patients with metastatic melanoma and have led to long-term durable response and in some cases can be curative. Despite these oncologic advances, various treatment-limiting side effects can occur. In particular, cardiovascular toxicities can contribute to overall morbidity and mortality in these patients. Toxicities range from asymptomatic QT prolongation and mild LV dysfunction to fulminant myocarditis and potentially life-threatening arrhythmias. A multidisciplinary approach to the care of these patients which includes cardio-oncology evaluation is necessary to develop both risk mitigation and treatment strategies to ensure patients continue receiving necessary and effective melanoma treatments while minimizing long-term adverse cardiovascular effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.