Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35192082›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022

Application of machine learning in screening for congenital heart diseases using fetal echocardiography.

Vien T Truong, Binh P Nguyen, Thanh-Hoang Nguyen-Vo, Wojciech Mazur, Eugene S Chung, Cassady Palmer, Justin T Tretter, Tarek Alsaied, Vy T Pham, Huan Q Do and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The molecular mechanisms of cardiac development and related diseases.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evolution of Fetal Cardiac Imaging over the Last 20 Years.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in the study of fetal heart.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Vien T Truong *The Christ Hospital Health Network, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Binh P Nguyen *School of Mathematics and Statistics, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Thanh-Hoang Nguyen-VoSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Wojciech MazurThe Christ Hospital Health Network, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Eugene S ChungThe Christ Hospital Health Network, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Cassady PalmerThe Christ Hospital Health Network, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Justin T TretterCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Tarek AlsaiedCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Vy T PhamWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Huan Q DoHeart Institute of HCMC, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Phuong T N DoHeart Institute of HCMC, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Vinh N PhamHeart Center, Tam Anh General Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Ban N HaHeart Institute of HCMC, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Hoa N ChauUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Tuyen K LeHeart Institute of HCMC, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. lekimtuyen09@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing body of literature supporting the utilization of machine learning (ML) to improve diagnosis and prognosis tools of cardiovascular disease. The current study was to investigate the impact that the ML framework may have on the sensitivity of predicting the presence or absence of congenital heart disease (CHD) using fetal echocardiography. A comprehensive fetal echocardiogram including 2D cardiac chamber quantification, valvar assessments, assessment of great vessel morphology, and Doppler-derived blood flow interrogation was recorded. The postnatal echocardiogram was used to ascertain the diagnosis of CHD. A random forest (RF) algorithm with a nested tenfold cross-validation was used to train models for assessing the presence of CHD. The study population was derived from a database of 3910 singleton fetuses with maternal age of 28.8 ± 5.2 years and gestational age at the time of fetal echocardiography of 22.0 weeks (IQR 21-24). The proportion of CHD was 14.1% for the studied cohort confirmed by post-natal echocardiograms. Our proposed RF-based framework provided a sensitivity of 0.85, a specificity of 0.88, a positive predictive value of 0.55 and a negative predictive value of 0.97 to detect the CHD with the mean of mean ROC curves of 0.94 and the mean of mean PR curves of 0.84. Additionally, six first features, including cardiac axis, peak velocity of blood flow across the pulmonic valve, cardiothoracic ratio, pulmonary valvar annulus diameter, right ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and aortic valvar annulus diameter, are essential features that play crucial roles in adding more predictive values to the model in detecting patients with CHD. ML using RF can provide increased sensitivity in prenatal CHD screening with very good performance. The incorporation of ML algorithms into fetal echocardiography may further standardize the assessment for CHD.

Indexed as

Congenital heart diseaseFetal echocardiographyMachine learningRandom forest

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.