ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022
Application of machine learning in screening for congenital heart diseases using fetal echocardiography.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of machine learning for diagnosis and prognostic prediction of congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Congenital heart disease diagnosis using machine learning: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence models in detecting congenital heart disease in the second-trimester fetus through prenatal cardiac screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Multimodal Fusion of Echocardiogram Images and Electronic Medical Records for Heart Disease Screening: Retrospective Algorithm Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence-enabled prenatal ultrasound for the detection of fetal cardiac abnormalities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Fetal Growth Restriction Management: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU · 2025Review
- Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes of Fetal Cardiac Disease: A Pilot Study.Pediatric cardiology · 2025Article
- The Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Echocardiographic Detection of Congenital Heart Defects in the Fetus: A Mini-Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Fetal and Pediatric Echocardiography.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The molecular mechanisms of cardiac development and related diseases.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- Optimizing Object Detection Algorithms for Congenital Heart Diseases in Echocardiography: Exploring Bounding Box Sizes and Data Augmentation Techniques.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- An Integrated Machine Learning Approach for Congestive Heart Failure Prediction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evolution of Fetal Cardiac Imaging over the Last 20 Years.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- E-Health: A Game Changer in Fetal and Neonatal Cardiology?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- An active learning machine technique based prediction of cardiovascular heart disease from UCI-repository database.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Congenital Heart Disease: Current State and Prospects.JACC. Advances · 2022Review
- Effectively Predicting the Presence of Coronary Heart Disease Using Machine Learning Classifiers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in the study of fetal heart.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Automation in the Fields of Gynaecology and Obstetrics - an Assessment of the State of Play.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a growing body of literature supporting the utilization of machine learning (ML) to improve diagnosis and prognosis tools of cardiovascular disease. The current study was to investigate the impact that the ML framework may have on the sensitivity of predicting the presence or absence of congenital heart disease (CHD) using fetal echocardiography. A comprehensive fetal echocardiogram including 2D cardiac chamber quantification, valvar assessments, assessment of great vessel morphology, and Doppler-derived blood flow interrogation was recorded. The postnatal echocardiogram was used to ascertain the diagnosis of CHD. A random forest (RF) algorithm with a nested tenfold cross-validation was used to train models for assessing the presence of CHD. The study population was derived from a database of 3910 singleton fetuses with maternal age of 28.8 ± 5.2 years and gestational age at the time of fetal echocardiography of 22.0 weeks (IQR 21-24). The proportion of CHD was 14.1% for the studied cohort confirmed by post-natal echocardiograms. Our proposed RF-based framework provided a sensitivity of 0.85, a specificity of 0.88, a positive predictive value of 0.55 and a negative predictive value of 0.97 to detect the CHD with the mean of mean ROC curves of 0.94 and the mean of mean PR curves of 0.84. Additionally, six first features, including cardiac axis, peak velocity of blood flow across the pulmonic valve, cardiothoracic ratio, pulmonary valvar annulus diameter, right ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and aortic valvar annulus diameter, are essential features that play crucial roles in adding more predictive values to the model in detecting patients with CHD. ML using RF can provide increased sensitivity in prenatal CHD screening with very good performance. The incorporation of ML algorithms into fetal echocardiography may further standardize the assessment for CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35192082What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.