Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35192066›Full record

ArticleArchives of microbiology2022

Distinct gut microbiota profiles of Asian honey bee (Apis cerana) foragers.

Lucsame Gruneck, Eleni Gentekaki, Kitiphong Khongphinitbunjong, Siam Popluechai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucsame Gruneck *Gut Microbiome Research Group, Mae Fah Luang University, Muang, Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Eleni Gentekaki *Gut Microbiome Research Group, Mae Fah Luang University, Muang, Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Kitiphong KhongphinitbunjongSchool of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Muang, Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Siam PopluechaiGut Microbiome Research Group, Mae Fah Luang University, Muang, Chiang Rai, Thailand. siam@mfu.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4431-2810

Funding

National Research Council of Thailand 622B01057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bee gut microbial communities have been studied extensively and linked to honey bee biology in terms of stages of bee development and behavior. Associations of bee gut microbiota in health and disease have also been explored. A large number of studies have centered on the gut microbiome of Apis mellifera, with similar investigations lagging far behind in Asian honey bee foragers. In this study, we characterized and compared the gut bacterial profiles of foragers and nurse bees of A. cerana and A. mellifera. Analysis of 16S rRNA partial gene sequences revealed significant differences in gut bacterial communities between the two honey bee species. Despite sharing dominant taxa, Bacteroides was more abundant in A. cerana, while Proteobacteria was higher in A. mellifera. Specific gut members are distinctly associated with hosts performing different tasks (i.e. nurse bees versus foragers). An exclusive abundance of Apibacter detected in Asian honey bee seemed to be a microbial signature of A. cerana foragers. Overall, our study highlights that variations in gut microbiota could be linked to task-specific (nurse bees and foragers) bacterial species associated with honey bees. Future investigations on the symbiotic relationship between host and the resident microbiota would be beneficial for improving honey bee health.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaBeesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA sequencingApis ceranaApis melliferaForagerGut microbiota

Identifiers

PMID35192066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.