Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35192022›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2022

Evaluation of the post-processing algorithms SimGrid and S-Enhance for paediatric intensive care patients and neonates.

Paul-Christian Krueger, Katharina Ebeling, Matthias Waginger, Katja Glutig, Marcel Scheithauer, Peter Schlattmann, Hans Proquitté, Hans-Joachim Mentzel

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul-Christian KruegerSection of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany. paul-christian.krueger@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9545-8115
Katharina EbelingSection of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Matthias WagingerSection of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Katja GlutigSection of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7669-5193
Marcel ScheithauerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Peter SchlattmannCenter for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7420-7707
Hans ProquittéSection of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1327-5970
Hans-Joachim MentzelSection of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0199-3257
Jena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-processing software can be used in digital radiography to achieve higher image quality, especially in cases of scattered radiation. SimGrid is a grid-like software based on a Convolutional Neuronal Network that estimates the distribution and degree of scattered radiation in radiographs and thus improves image quality by simulating an anti-scatter grid. S-Enhance is an algorithm programmed to improve contrast visibility of foreign material.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the SimGrid and S-Enhance digital radiography post-processing methods for neonatology and paediatric intensive care. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo hundred and ten radiographs from the neonatal (n = 101, 0 to 6 months of age) and paediatric (n = 109, 6 months to 18 years of age) intensive care units performed in daily clinical routine using a mobile digital radiography system were post-processed with one of the algorithms, anonymized and then evaluated comparatively by two experienced paediatric radiologists. For every radiograph, patient data and exposure data were collected and analysed.

resultsAnalysis of different radiographs showed that SimGrid significantly improves image quality for patients with a weight above 10 kg (range: 10-30 kg: odds ratio [OR] = 6.683, P < 0.0001), especially regarding the tracheobronchial system, intestinal gas, and bones. Utilizing S-Enhance significantly advances the assessment of foreign material (OR = 136.111, P < 0.0001) and bones (OR = 34.917, P < 0.0001) for children of all ages and weight, whereas overall image quality decreases.

conclusionSimGrid offers a differentiated spectrum in image improvement for children beyond the neonatal period whereas S-Enhance especially improves visibility of foreign material and bones for all patients.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsRadiographic Image EnhancementChildCritical CareHumansInfant, NewbornRadiation DosageRadiographyRadiography, ThoracicScattering, RadiationDeep learningDigital radiographyImage enhancementNeonatal intensive care unitPediatric intensive care unitRadiation dosageRadiography

Identifiers

PMID35192022
PMCPMC9107410
OpenAlexW4213323600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.