ArticleArchives of virology2022
Development of an immunofluorescence assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2.
Article in Archives of virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2, the etiologic agent of the COVID-19 pandemic, emerged as the cause of a global crisis in 2019. Currently, the main method for identification of SARS-CoV-2 is a reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assay designed to detect viral RNA in oropharyngeal (OP) or nasopharyngeal (NP) samples. While the PCR assay is considered highly specific and sensitive, this method cannot determine the infectivity of the sample, which may assist in evaluation of virus transmissibility from patients and breaking transmission chains. Thus, cell-culture-based approaches such as cytopathic effect (CPE) assays are routinely employed for the identification of infectious viruses in NP/OP samples. Despite their high sensitivity, CPE assays take several days and require additional diagnostic tests in order to verify the identity of the pathogen. We have therefore developed a rapid immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for the specific detection of SARS-CoV-2 in NP/OP samples following cell culture infection. Initially, IFA was carried out on Vero E6 cultures infected with SARS-CoV-2 at defined concentrations, and infection was monitored at different time points. This test was able to yield positive signals in cultures infected with 10 pfu/ml at 12 hours postinfection (PI). Increasing the incubation time to 24 hours reduced the detectable infective dose to 1 pfu/ml. These IFA signals occur before the development of CPE. When compared to the CPE test, IFA has the advantages of specificity, rapid detection, and sensitivity, as demonstrated in this work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.