Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35191995›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2022

[Quality-oriented facility selection in the rehabilitation of the German pension insurance].

Susanne Weinbrenner, Eve Luise Kayser, Nina-Tamara Moser, Thorsten Siebert

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susanne WeinbrennerGeschäftsbereich Prävention, Rehabilitation und Sozialmedizin, Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, Ruhrstr. 2, 10704, Berlin, Deutschland. susanne.weinbrenner@drv-bund.de.
Eve Luise KayserGeschäftsbereich Prävention, Rehabilitation und Sozialmedizin, Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, Ruhrstr. 2, 10704, Berlin, Deutschland.
Nina-Tamara MoserGeschäftsbereich Prävention, Rehabilitation und Sozialmedizin, Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, Ruhrstr. 2, 10704, Berlin, Deutschland.
Thorsten SiebertGeschäftsbereich Prävention, Rehabilitation und Sozialmedizin, Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, Ruhrstr. 2, 10704, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to Sixth Book of the Social Code (SGB VI), the German Pension Insurance (GPI) has the mandate to maintain or restore the employability of its insured persons. In order to achieve this goal, the GPI offers its insurees rehabilitation benefits. These are, on the one hand, services for prevention and medical rehabilitation (rehab) and, on the other hand, services for return-to-work or stay-at-work, respectively. In order to fulfill this mandate in the best possible way, in 1990 the GPI introduced instruments of external quality assurance (EQS) with scientific support. The system was firmly established in 1997. Since then, all rehab facilities owned and managed by the GPI are obliged to participate in the EQS system.Over the years, a large number of instruments and procedures have been developed that can map various aspects of quality as structure, process, and outcome. Until 2017, results of the EQS had no influence on the cooperation between the GPI and service providers. With the binding decision of the Federal Executive Board of the GPI in 2017, for the first time the GPI linked the allocation of rehab services for specific patients with the results of EQS. On this basis - confirmed by article 3 of the Digital Pension Overview Act - new paths are being taken. As part of the technically supported selection of a suitable facility for insured persons, quality should systematically and transparently acquire special importance and be consistently taken into account when occupying rehab facilities.This article gives an overview of the development of the proved and tested instruments of rehab quality assurance (QA), their current application, and an outlook on the rehab QA of the future.

Indexed as

InsurancePensionsGermanyHumansNational Health ProgramsRehabilitation CentersExternal quality assuranceLaw on digital pension overviewProcurement of rehabilitation servicesRehabilitationSelection of facilities

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.