Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35191778›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2022

Advanced Understanding of Prokaryotic Biofilm Formation through Use of a Cost-Effective and Versatile Multipanel Adhesion (mPAD) Mount.

Stefan Schulze, Heather Schiller, Jordan Solomonic, Orkan Telhan, Kyle Costa, Mechthild Pohlschroder

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 60% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan Schulze *Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvaniagrid.25879.31, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4771-7987
Heather Schiller *Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvaniagrid.25879.31, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7622-4735
Jordan SolomonicWeitzman School of Design, University of Pennsylvaniagrid.25879.31, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Orkan TelhanWeitzman School of Design, University of Pennsylvaniagrid.25879.31, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kyle CostaDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0407-1431
Mechthild PohlschroderDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvaniagrid.25879.31, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7729-1342
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most microorganisms exist in biofilms, which comprise aggregates of cells surrounded by an extracellular matrix that provides protection from external stresses. Based on the conditions under which they form, biofilm structures vary in significant ways. For instance, biofilms that develop when microbes are incubated under static conditions differ from those formed when microbes encounter the shear forces of a flowing liquid. Moreover, biofilms develop dynamically over time. Here, we describe a cost-effective coverslip holder, printed with a three-dimensional (3D) printer, that facilitates surface adhesion assays under a broad range of standing and shaking culture conditions. This

Indexed as

BiofilmsMicrobiological TechniquesProkaryotic CellsCost-Benefit AnalysisHaloferax volcaniiPseudomonas aeruginosaArchaeaBacteriabiofilm assaybiofilmsHaloferax volcaniimicrocoloniesPseudomonas aeruginosashear forcessurface attachment

Identifiers

PMID35191778
PMCPMC8863052
OpenAlexW4212879386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.